PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OPTZ vs. MOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

OPTZ vs. MOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Optimize Strategy Index ETF (OPTZ) and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

OPTZ vs. MOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
OPTZ
Optimize Strategy Index ETF
0.41%22.83%16.81%
MOO
VanEck Agribusiness ETF
16.09%15.61%-7.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OPTZ achieves a 0.41% return, which is significantly lower than MOO's 16.09% return.


OPTZ

1D
3.97%
1M
-6.58%
YTD
0.41%
6M
3.12%
1Y
35.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MOO

1D
1.43%
1M
-1.27%
YTD
16.09%
6M
17.90%
1Y
27.55%
3Y*
2.03%
5Y*
1.67%
10Y*
8.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


OPTZ vs. MOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

OPTZ has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than MOO's 0.55% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

OPTZ vs. MOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OPTZ
OPTZ Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
OPTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OPTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
OPTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
OPTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
OPTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

MOO
MOO Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
MOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
MOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OPTZ vs. MOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Optimize Strategy Index ETF (OPTZ) and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OPTZMOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.52

1.63

-0.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.23

2.33

-0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.31

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

2.44

-0.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.20

9.05

+2.15

OPTZ vs. MOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OPTZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the MOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OPTZ and MOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OPTZMOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.52

1.63

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.02

0.24

+0.78

Correlation

The correlation between OPTZ and MOO is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

OPTZ vs. MOO - Dividend Comparison

OPTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than MOO's 2.13% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OPTZ
Optimize Strategy Index ETF
0.58%0.58%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MOO
VanEck Agribusiness ETF
2.13%2.47%3.41%2.93%2.15%1.17%1.10%1.26%1.69%1.44%2.14%2.89%

Drawdowns

OPTZ vs. MOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OPTZ drawdown since its inception was -25.75%, smaller than the maximum MOO drawdown of -69.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OPTZ and MOO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


OPTZMOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.75%

-69.53%

+43.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.58%

-11.46%

-3.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.08%

-13.01%

+5.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.61%

-16.99%

+13.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

3.09%

+0.04%

Volatility

OPTZ vs. MOO - Volatility Comparison

Optimize Strategy Index ETF (OPTZ) has a higher volatility of 7.53% compared to VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) at 6.00%. This indicates that OPTZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


OPTZMOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.53%

6.00%

+1.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.94%

10.81%

+2.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.36%

17.03%

+6.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.60%

17.09%

+3.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.60%

18.20%

+2.40%