OPTZ vs. FAAR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

OPTZ (Optimize Strategy Index ETF) and FAAR (First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OPTZ is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Optimize Strategy Index, while FAAR is a Commodities fund actively managed by First Trust. OPTZ is passively managed, while FAAR is actively managed. Over the past year, OPTZ returned 61.16% vs 28.33% for FAAR. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. OPTZ charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FAAR.

Performance

OPTZ vs. FAAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Optimize Strategy Index ETF (OPTZ) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OPTZ achieves a 32.54% return, which is significantly higher than FAAR's 19.14% return.

OPTZ

• 1D: -3.23%
• 1M: 7.00%
• YTD: 32.54%
• 6M: 30.49%
• 1Y: 61.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FAAR

• 1D: -0.91%
• 1M: -5.21%
• YTD: 19.14%
• 6M: 18.06%
• 1Y: 28.33%
• 3Y*: 10.57%
• 5Y*: 7.72%
• 10Y*: 4.69%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OPTZ vs. FAAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
OPTZ Optimize Strategy Index ETF	32.54%	22.83%	16.41%
FAAR First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF	19.14%	8.07%	-0.36%

Correlation

The correlation between OPTZ and FAAR is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2024	0.01

Return for Risk

OPTZ vs. FAAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OPTZ

OPTZ Risk / Return Rank: 92
OPTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
OPTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
OPTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 89
OPTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
OPTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 94

FAAR

FAAR Risk / Return Rank: 75
FAAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
FAAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
FAAR Omega Ratio Rank: 65
FAAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
FAAR Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OPTZ vs. FAAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Optimize Strategy Index ETF (OPTZ) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OPTZ	FAAR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.09	2.15	+0.94
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.95	3.09	+0.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.37	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.78	4.52	+1.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	25.39	15.18	+10.21

OPTZ vs. FAAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OPTZ Sharpe Ratio is 3.09, which is higher than the FAAR Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OPTZ and FAAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

OPTZ vs. FAAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OPTZ drawdown since its inception was -25.75%, which is greater than FAAR's maximum drawdown of -18.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OPTZ and FAAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	OPTZ	FAAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.75%	-18.03%	-7.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.63%	-6.29%	-4.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.54%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.03%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-18.03%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.23%	-6.29%	+3.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.36%	-7.82%	+4.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.42%	1.87%	+0.55%

Volatility

OPTZ vs. FAAR - Volatility Comparison

Optimize Strategy Index ETF (OPTZ) has a higher volatility of 9.74% compared to First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) at 2.55%. This indicates that OPTZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OPTZ	FAAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.74%	2.55%	+7.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.08%	9.68%	+6.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.88%	13.38%	+6.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.28%	12.96%	+8.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.28%	11.54%	+9.74%

OPTZ vs. FAAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

OPTZ has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FAAR's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

OPTZ vs. FAAR - Dividend Comparison

OPTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than FAAR's 9.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FAAR First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF	9.66%	11.63%	3.45%	3.20%	5.82%	6.49%	3.05%	1.02%	0.58%	2.83%
OPTZ Optimize Strategy Index ETF	0.44%	0.58%	0.32%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OPTZ and FAAR in my portfolio?

OPTZ and FAAR have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OPTZ or FAAR?

OPTZ has higher volatility (9.74%) compared to FAAR (2.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OPTZ dropped -25.75% vs FAAR's -18.03%.

Which ETF is better, OPTZ or FAAR?

On 1-year performance, OPTZ leads with 61.16% vs 28.33% for FAAR. On fees, OPTZ is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FAAR has been the lower-risk option at 2.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OPTZ or FAAR?

Over the 1-year period, OPTZ has performed better with a 61.16% return vs 28.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OPTZ or FAAR?

OPTZ is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FAAR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OPTZ or FAAR?

FAAR has the higher dividend yield at 9.66%, compared with 0.44% for OPTZ.

What is the main difference between OPTZ and FAAR?

OPTZ is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while FAAR is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Optimize and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for OPTZ and 0.95% for FAAR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OPTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.