PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OPTZ vs. COMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OPTZ vs. COMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Optimize Strategy Index ETF (OPTZ) and iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OPTZ achieves a 25.55% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 30.19% return.


OPTZ

1D
-2.11%
1M
-5.13%
6M
20.05%
YTD
25.55%
1Y
45.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

COMT

1D
-0.49%
1M
2.53%
6M
26.18%
YTD
30.19%
1Y
33.20%
3Y*
12.71%
5Y*
11.75%
10Y*
8.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OPTZ vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
OPTZ
Optimize Strategy Index ETF
25.55%22.83%16.41%
COMT
iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF
30.19%6.07%-3.41%

Correlation

The correlation between OPTZ and COMT is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2024

-0.00

The correlation between OPTZ and COMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to -0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OPTZ vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OPTZ
OPTZ Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
OPTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OPTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
OPTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
OPTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
OPTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

COMT
COMT Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
COMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
COMT Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
COMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
COMT Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OPTZ vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Optimize Strategy Index ETF (OPTZ) and iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OPTZCOMTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.27

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.29

1.90

+2.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.50

6.35

+10.16

OPTZ vs. COMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OPTZ Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is higher than the COMT Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OPTZ and COMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OPTZ vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OPTZ drawdown since its inception was -25.75%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OPTZ and COMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OPTZCOMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.75%

-51.89%

+26.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.63%

-17.57%

+6.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.07%

-11.28%

+2.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.39%

-23.95%

+20.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.76%

5.24%

-2.48%

Volatility

OPTZ vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison

Optimize Strategy Index ETF (OPTZ) has a higher volatility of 9.39% compared to iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT) at 5.91%. This indicates that OPTZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OPTZCOMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.39%

5.91%

+3.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.81%

19.67%

-1.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.10%

21.54%

-0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.66%

21.20%

+0.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.66%

18.85%

+2.81%

OPTZ vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

OPTZ has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

OPTZ vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison

OPTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than COMT's 5.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COMT
iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF
5.95%7.74%4.90%5.19%29.79%17.79%0.36%2.61%11.65%5.16%0.52%1.44%
OPTZ
Optimize Strategy Index ETF
0.46%0.58%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


OPTZ and COMT have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OPTZ has higher volatility (9.39%) compared to COMT (5.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OPTZ dropped -25.75% vs COMT's -51.89%.

On 1-year performance, OPTZ leads with 45.35% vs 33.20% for COMT. On fees, OPTZ is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, COMT has been the lower-risk option at 5.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, OPTZ has performed better with a 45.35% return vs 33.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OPTZ is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for COMT.

COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.95%, compared with 0.46% for OPTZ.

OPTZ is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while COMT is Commodities. OPTZ tracks Optimize Strategy Index, while COMT tracks S&P GSCI Dynamic Roll (USD) Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: Optimize and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for OPTZ and 0.48% for COMT.

OPTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OPTZ and COMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer