OPPG vs. NZAC
OPPG (WisdomTree GeoAlpha Opportunities Fund) and NZAC (SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF) are both Global Equities funds - OPPG tracks the WisdomTree GeoAlpha Opportunities Index while NZAC tracks the MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.58 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. OPPG charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for NZAC.
Performance
OPPG vs. NZAC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
OPPG
- 1D
- 1.90%
- 1M
- 2.90%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
NZAC
- 1D
- 1.92%
- 1M
- 3.13%
- 6M
- 10.13%
- YTD
- 10.53%
- 1Y
- 20.64%
- 3Y*
- 18.61%
- 5Y*
- 9.74%
- 10Y*
- 11.95%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.33%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $222.08K | $162.23K | $205.77K | |
| $169.47K | $79.83K | $79.83K |
OPPG vs. NZAC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
OPPG WisdomTree GeoAlpha Opportunities Fund | 2.90% |
NZAC SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF | 3.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between OPPG and NZAC is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2026 | 0.58 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OPPG vs. NZAC — Risk / Return Rank
OPPG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NZAC
OPPG vs. NZAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree GeoAlpha Opportunities Fund (OPPG) and SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OPPG | NZAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.05 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.11 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OPPG vs. NZAC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OPPG drawdown since its inception was -3.61%, smaller than the maximum NZAC drawdown of -33.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OPPG and NZAC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OPPG | NZAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.61% | -33.72% | +30.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.19% | -5.28% | +4.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.55% | — |
Volatility
OPPG vs. NZAC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OPPG | NZAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.48% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.81% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.94% | 14.13% | +0.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.94% | 16.99% | -2.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.94% | 17.09% | -2.15% |
OPPG vs. NZAC - Expense Ratio Comparison
OPPG has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than NZAC's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
OPPG vs. NZAC - Dividend Comparison
OPPG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NZAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NZAC SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF | 2.01% | 1.90% | 1.88% | 1.65% | 1.81% | 1.62% | 1.59% | 2.17% | 2.53% | 2.20% | 2.00% | 2.40% |
OPPG WisdomTree GeoAlpha Opportunities Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OPPG and NZAC have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NZAC is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NZAC is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for OPPG.
NZAC has the higher dividend yield at 2.01%, compared with 0.00% for OPPG.
OPPG tracks WisdomTree GeoAlpha Opportunities Index, while NZAC tracks MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for OPPG and 0.12% for NZAC.
Find the right allocation for OPPG and NZAC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer