OPPAX vs. FGIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Global Fund (OPPAX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX).
OPPAX is managed by Invesco. It was launched on Dec 21, 1969. FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007.
Performance
OPPAX vs. FGIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
OPPAX vs. FGIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OPPAX Invesco Global Fund | -9.72% | 15.20% | 16.16% | 34.18% | -32.18% | 15.23% | 27.64% | 31.58% | -13.65% | 36.25% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.53% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OPPAX achieves a -9.72% return, which is significantly lower than FGIAX's 9.53% return. Over the past 10 years, OPPAX has outperformed FGIAX with an annualized return of 10.39%, while FGIAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.70% annualized return.
OPPAX
- 1D
- 4.19%
- 1M
- -5.95%
- YTD
- -9.72%
- 6M
- -6.68%
- 1Y
- 9.88%
- 3Y*
- 12.51%
- 5Y*
- 4.20%
- 10Y*
- 10.39%
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -3.50%
- YTD
- 9.53%
- 6M
- 10.11%
- 1Y
- 20.31%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
OPPAX vs. FGIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
OPPAX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is lower than FGIAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
OPPAX vs. FGIAX — Risk / Return Rank
OPPAX
FGIAX
OPPAX vs. FGIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Fund (OPPAX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OPPAX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.53 | 1.75 | -1.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.95 | 2.26 | -1.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.35 | -0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.05 | 2.61 | -2.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.18 | 12.12 | -11.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OPPAX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 | 1.75 | -1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | 0.80 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.58 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.42 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between OPPAX and FGIAX is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
OPPAX vs. FGIAX - Dividend Comparison
OPPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.46%, more than FGIAX's 9.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OPPAX Invesco Global Fund | 27.46% | 24.79% | 11.93% | 10.72% | 14.18% | 7.18% | 5.72% | 1.35% | 12.92% | 5.92% | 0.69% | 5.17% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.12% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
Drawdowns
OPPAX vs. FGIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OPPAX drawdown since its inception was -60.39%, which is greater than FGIAX's maximum drawdown of -49.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OPPAX and FGIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| OPPAX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.39% | -49.35% | -11.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.26% | -8.29% | -7.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.90% | -21.08% | -20.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.90% | -38.02% | -3.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.75% | -3.78% | -8.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.49% | -7.22% | -8.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.54% | 1.78% | +3.76% |
Volatility
OPPAX vs. FGIAX - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Global Fund (OPPAX) has a higher volatility of 7.56% compared to Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) at 4.05%. This indicates that OPPAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| OPPAX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.56% | 4.05% | +3.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.76% | 7.09% | +5.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.47% | 12.28% | +9.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.19% | 13.08% | +8.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.63% | 15.17% | +5.46% |