OPCAX vs. FMBIX
OPCAX (Invesco California Municipal Fund) and FMBIX (Fidelity Municipal Bond Index Fund) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. OPCAX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for FMBIX.
Performance
OPCAX vs. FMBIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
OPCAX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 1.24%
- YTD
- 1.71%
- 6M
- 2.06%
- 1Y
- 7.06%
- 3Y*
- 3.70%
- 5Y*
- 0.42%
- 10Y*
- 3.05%
FMBIX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OPCAX vs. FMBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OPCAX Invesco California Municipal Fund | 1.71% | 2.59% | 2.86% | 6.86% | -12.10% | 3.56% | 6.07% | 3.07% |
FMBIX Fidelity Municipal Bond Index Fund | 0.00% | 0.60% | 1.32% | 5.89% | -10.00% | 1.14% | 3.10% | 1.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between OPCAX and FMBIX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2019 | 0.80 |
The correlation between OPCAX and FMBIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (3 years) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OPCAX vs. FMBIX — Risk / Return Rank
OPCAX
FMBIX
OPCAX vs. FMBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco California Municipal Fund (OPCAX) and Fidelity Municipal Bond Index Fund (FMBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OPCAX | FMBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.00 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.07 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.80 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OPCAX | FMBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.00 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.97 | — | — |
Drawdowns
OPCAX vs. FMBIX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OPCAX | FMBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.30% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.17% | — | — |
Volatility
OPCAX vs. FMBIX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OPCAX | FMBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.51% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.73% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.96% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.46% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.12% | — | — |
OPCAX vs. FMBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
OPCAX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FMBIX's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
OPCAX vs. FMBIX - Dividend Comparison
OPCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, while FMBIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMBIX Fidelity Municipal Bond Index Fund | 0.00% | 0.70% | 2.60% | 2.29% | 1.17% | 1.28% | 1.59% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OPCAX Invesco California Municipal Fund | 2.76% | 4.76% | 4.19% | 3.06% | 2.86% | 3.05% | 3.15% | 3.64% | 3.71% | 4.59% | 4.92% | 5.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OPCAX and FMBIX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for OPCAX and FMBIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer