OPCAX vs. SCMB
OPCAX (Invesco California Municipal Fund) and SCMB (Schwab Municipal Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 3 years, OPCAX returned 3.61%/yr vs 3.41%/yr for SCMB. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OPCAX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCMB.
Performance
OPCAX vs. SCMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OPCAX achieves a 1.45% return, which is significantly higher than SCMB's 1.19% return.
OPCAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- 1.45%
- 6M
- 1.81%
- 1Y
- 6.79%
- 3Y*
- 3.61%
- 5Y*
- 0.37%
- 10Y*
- 3.03%
SCMB
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 1.19%
- 6M
- 1.59%
- 1Y
- 6.98%
- 3Y*
- 3.41%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OPCAX vs. SCMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OPCAX Invesco California Municipal Fund | 1.45% | 2.59% | 2.86% | 6.86% | 3.67% |
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF | 1.19% | 3.78% | 0.91% | 5.86% | 3.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between OPCAX and SCMB is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2022 | 0.73 |
The correlation between OPCAX and SCMB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OPCAX vs. SCMB — Risk / Return Rank
OPCAX
SCMB
OPCAX vs. SCMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco California Municipal Fund (OPCAX) and Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OPCAX | SCMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.75 | 2.39 | -0.64 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.66 | 3.52 | -0.86 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.51 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.04 | 2.28 | -0.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.68 | 7.65 | -1.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OPCAX | SCMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75 | 2.39 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.97 | 0.98 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
OPCAX vs. SCMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OPCAX drawdown since its inception was -47.36%, which is greater than SCMB's maximum drawdown of -6.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OPCAX and SCMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OPCAX | SCMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.36% | -6.13% | -41.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.25% | -2.92% | -0.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.46% | -5.57% | -2.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.75% | +0.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.30% | -1.32% | -2.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.17% | 0.87% | +0.30% |
Volatility
OPCAX vs. SCMB - Volatility Comparison
Invesco California Municipal Fund (OPCAX) has a higher volatility of 1.49% compared to Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB) at 1.04%. This indicates that OPCAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OPCAX | SCMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.49% | 1.04% | +0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.72% | 2.17% | +0.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.96% | 2.95% | +1.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.46% | 4.16% | +1.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.12% | 4.16% | +0.96% |
OPCAX vs. SCMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
OPCAX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SCMB's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
OPCAX vs. SCMB - Dividend Comparison
OPCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, less than SCMB's 3.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OPCAX Invesco California Municipal Fund | 2.77% | 4.76% | 4.19% | 3.06% | 2.86% | 3.05% | 3.15% | 3.64% | 3.71% | 4.59% | 4.92% | 5.48% |
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF | 3.53% | 3.36% | 3.34% | 3.10% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OPCAX and SCMB have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OPCAX has higher volatility (1.49%) compared to SCMB (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OPCAX dropped -47.36% vs SCMB's -6.13%.
SCMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OPCAX and SCMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer