PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OPCAX vs. CMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OPCAX vs. CMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco California Municipal Fund (OPCAX) and iShares California Muni Bond ETF (CMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OPCAX achieves a 1.45% return, which is significantly higher than CMF's 0.99% return. Over the past 10 years, OPCAX has outperformed CMF with an annualized return of 3.03%, while CMF has yielded a comparatively lower 1.75% annualized return.


OPCAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.73%
YTD
1.45%
6M
1.81%
1Y
6.79%
3Y*
3.61%
5Y*
0.37%
10Y*
3.03%

CMF

1D
0.16%
1M
0.57%
YTD
0.99%
6M
1.38%
1Y
6.74%
3Y*
3.32%
5Y*
0.69%
10Y*
1.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OPCAX vs. CMF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OPCAX
Invesco California Municipal Fund
1.45%2.59%2.86%6.86%-12.10%3.56%6.07%10.31%6.59%4.47%
CMF
iShares California Muni Bond ETF
0.99%3.36%1.65%5.71%-8.27%0.78%4.50%6.94%0.99%4.63%

Correlation

The correlation between OPCAX and CMF is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2007

0.46

Over the past year, OPCAX and CMF have become more correlated (0.69) than their long-term average of 0.46, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OPCAX vs. CMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OPCAX
OPCAX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
OPCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OPCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
OPCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
OPCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
OPCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

CMF
CMF Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
CMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMF Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
CMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMF Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OPCAX vs. CMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco California Municipal Fund (OPCAX) and iShares California Muni Bond ETF (CMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OPCAXCMFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.75

2.42

-0.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.66

3.47

-0.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.54

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

2.18

-0.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.68

7.36

-1.68

OPCAX vs. CMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OPCAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the CMF Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OPCAX and CMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OPCAXCMFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

2.42

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

0.16

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.35

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.97

0.39

+0.57

Drawdowns

OPCAX vs. CMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OPCAX drawdown since its inception was -47.36%, which is greater than CMF's maximum drawdown of -16.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OPCAX and CMF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OPCAXCMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.36%

-16.45%

-30.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.25%

-2.91%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.46%

-5.22%

-3.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.53%

-12.45%

-6.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.53%

-14.57%

-3.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.88%

+0.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.30%

-4.77%

+0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

0.86%

+0.31%

Volatility

OPCAX vs. CMF - Volatility Comparison

Invesco California Municipal Fund (OPCAX) has a higher volatility of 1.49% compared to iShares California Muni Bond ETF (CMF) at 0.85%. This indicates that OPCAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OPCAXCMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.49%

0.85%

+0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.72%

2.12%

+0.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.96%

2.83%

+1.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.46%

4.19%

+1.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.12%

5.08%

+0.04%

OPCAX vs. CMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

OPCAX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CMF's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

OPCAX vs. CMF - Dividend Comparison

OPCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, less than CMF's 2.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMF
iShares California Muni Bond ETF
2.95%2.94%2.78%2.29%1.91%1.58%1.80%2.03%2.17%2.09%2.21%2.55%
OPCAX
Invesco California Municipal Fund
2.77%4.76%4.19%3.06%2.86%3.05%3.15%3.64%3.71%4.59%4.92%5.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


OPCAX and CMF have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OPCAX has higher volatility (1.49%) compared to CMF (0.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OPCAX dropped -47.36% vs CMF's -16.45%.

CMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OPCAX and CMF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer