OPAD vs. ASST
OPAD (Offerpad Solutions Inc.) and ASST (Strive, Inc.) are both stocks. OPAD operates in Real Estate - Services (Real Estate), while ASST operates in Asset Management (Financial Services). Over the past 3 years, OPAD returned -64.41%/yr vs -53.15%/yr for ASST. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
OPAD vs. ASST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OPAD achieves a -57.44% return, which is significantly lower than ASST's -16.40% return.
OPAD
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 1.58%
- 6M
- -62.13%
- YTD
- -57.44%
- 1Y
- -75.93%
- 3Y*
- -64.41%
- 5Y*
- -67.81%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -64.27%
ASST
- 1D
- 4.05%
- 1M
- -16.90%
- 6M
- -34.92%
- YTD
- -16.40%
- 1Y
- -86.35%
- 3Y*
- -53.15%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -67.29%
OPAD vs. ASST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
OPAD Offerpad Solutions Inc. | -57.44% | -57.54% | -72.20% | -41.09% |
ASST Strive, Inc. | -16.40% | 50.46% | -84.65% | -89.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between OPAD and ASST is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2023 | 0.13 |
The correlation between OPAD and ASST shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (all time) to 0.33 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
OPAD:
$15.96M
ASST:
$1.22B
OPAD:
-$1.08
ASST:
-$19.16
OPAD:
0.40
ASST:
77.49
OPAD:
$487.19M
ASST:
$5.73M
OPAD:
$37.09M
ASST:
-$7.43M
OPAD:
-$29.30M
ASST:
-$304.63M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OPAD vs. ASST — Risk / Return Rank
OPAD
ASST
OPAD vs. ASST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Offerpad Solutions Inc. (OPAD) and Strive, Inc. (ASST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OPAD | ASST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 0.90 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.82 | -0.90 | +0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.02 | -1.05 | +0.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OPAD vs. ASST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OPAD drawdown since its inception was -99.85%, roughly equal to the maximum ASST drawdown of -98.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OPAD and ASST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OPAD | ASST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.85% | -98.78% | -1.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -92.97% | -95.98% | +3.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -96.64% | -97.25% | +0.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.83% | -97.90% | -1.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.40% | -90.60% | +8.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 74.57% | 82.22% | -7.65% |
Volatility
OPAD vs. ASST - Volatility Comparison
Offerpad Solutions Inc. (OPAD) and Strive, Inc. (ASST) have volatilities of 25.72% and 25.01%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OPAD | ASST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.72% | 25.01% | +0.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 61.03% | 76.07% | -15.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 206.08% | 147.69% | +58.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 131.91% | 318.38% | -186.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 124.79% | 318.38% | -193.59% |
Dividends
OPAD vs. ASST - Dividend Comparison
Neither OPAD nor ASST has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
OPAD vs. ASST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Offerpad Solutions Inc. and Strive, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
OPAD and ASST have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OPAD has higher volatility (25.72%) compared to ASST (25.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OPAD dropped -99.85% vs ASST's -98.78%.
OPAD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.37 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OPAD and ASST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer