PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OPAD vs. FNGU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

OPAD vs. FNGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Offerpad Solutions Inc. (OPAD) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

OPAD vs. FNGU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
OPAD
Offerpad Solutions Inc.
-45.85%-46.70%
FNGU
MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN
-35.43%4.24%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OPAD achieves a -45.85% return, which is significantly lower than FNGU's -35.43% return.


OPAD

1D
13.75%
1M
-16.32%
YTD
-45.85%
6M
-83.70%
1Y
-60.53%
3Y*
-56.40%
5Y*
-66.34%
10Y*

FNGU

1D
4.35%
1M
-14.02%
YTD
-35.43%
6M
-44.05%
1Y
17.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OPAD vs. FNGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OPAD
OPAD Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
OPAD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OPAD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
OPAD Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
OPAD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
OPAD Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

FNGU
FNGU Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
FNGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNGU Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
FNGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNGU Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OPAD vs. FNGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Offerpad Solutions Inc. (OPAD) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OPADFNGUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.29

0.23

-0.52

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.80

0.92

-0.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.12

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.68

0.38

-1.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.04

1.00

-2.04

OPAD vs. FNGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OPAD Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is lower than the FNGU Sharpe Ratio of 0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OPAD and FNGU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OPADFNGUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.29

0.23

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.51

-0.37

-0.14

Correlation

The correlation between OPAD and FNGU is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

OPAD vs. FNGU - Dividend Comparison

Neither OPAD nor FNGU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

OPAD vs. FNGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OPAD drawdown since its inception was -99.81%, which is greater than FNGU's maximum drawdown of -60.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OPAD and FNGU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


OPADFNGUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.81%

-60.84%

-38.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-90.75%

-59.55%

-31.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.78%

-51.94%

-47.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-81.46%

-21.87%

-59.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

59.15%

22.51%

+36.64%

Volatility

OPAD vs. FNGU - Volatility Comparison

Offerpad Solutions Inc. (OPAD) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) have volatilities of 23.35% and 24.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


OPADFNGUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.35%

24.03%

-0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

80.72%

44.97%

+35.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

210.90%

77.71%

+133.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

130.15%

80.80%

+49.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

126.61%

80.80%

+45.81%