OOSP vs. QCLN

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

OOSP (Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF) and QCLN (First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - OOSP is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Obra, while QCLN is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy Index. OOSP is actively managed, while QCLN is passively managed. Over the past year, OOSP returned 6.50% vs 92.03% for QCLN. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. OOSP charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for QCLN.

Performance

OOSP vs. QCLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF (OOSP) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OOSP achieves a 2.66% return, which is significantly lower than QCLN's 37.20% return.

OOSP

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 2.66%
• 6M: 2.82%
• 1Y: 6.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QCLN

• 1D: -6.27%
• 1M: -3.52%
• YTD: 37.20%
• 6M: 31.57%
• 1Y: 92.03%
• 3Y*: 8.84%
• 5Y*: -1.13%
• 10Y*: 16.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OOSP vs. QCLN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
OOSP Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF	2.66%	7.41%	6.27%
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund	37.20%	31.81%	-1.45%

Correlation

The correlation between OOSP and QCLN is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2024	-0.06

Return for Risk

OOSP vs. QCLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OOSP

OOSP Risk / Return Rank: 72
OOSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
OOSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
OOSP Omega Ratio Rank: 67
OOSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
OOSP Martin Ratio Rank: 88

QCLN

QCLN Risk / Return Rank: 78
QCLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
QCLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
QCLN Omega Ratio Rank: 64
QCLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
QCLN Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OOSP vs. QCLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF (OOSP) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OOSP	QCLN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	2.47	-0.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.60	2.90	-0.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.37	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.97	5.64	-0.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.41	18.14	+0.27

OOSP vs. QCLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OOSP Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the QCLN Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OOSP and QCLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

OOSP vs. QCLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OOSP drawdown since its inception was -1.31%, smaller than the maximum QCLN drawdown of -76.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OOSP and QCLN.

Drawdown Indicators

	OOSP	QCLN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.31%	-76.18%	+74.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.31%	-16.40%	+15.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-56.08%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-69.49%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-71.73%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-29.12%	+29.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.20%	-43.40%	+43.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.35%	5.09%	-4.74%

Volatility

OOSP vs. QCLN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF (OOSP) is 0.39%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) has a volatility of 17.77%. This indicates that OOSP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OOSP	QCLN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.39%	17.77%	-17.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.17%	29.96%	-27.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.65%	37.45%	-33.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.32%	38.54%	-35.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.32%	35.21%	-31.89%

OOSP vs. QCLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

OOSP has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than QCLN's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

OOSP vs. QCLN - Dividend Comparison

OOSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.45%, more than QCLN's 0.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
OOSP Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF	6.45%	6.71%	5.42%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund	0.16%	0.25%	0.87%	0.76%	0.33%	0.01%	0.30%	0.85%	1.03%	0.45%	1.24%	0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OOSP and QCLN in my portfolio?

OOSP and QCLN have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OOSP or QCLN?

QCLN has higher volatility (17.77%) compared to OOSP (0.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OOSP dropped -1.31% vs QCLN's -76.18%.

Which ETF is better, OOSP or QCLN?

On 1-year performance, QCLN leads with 92.03% vs 6.50% for OOSP. On fees, QCLN is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, OOSP has been the lower-risk option at 0.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OOSP or QCLN?

Over the 1-year period, QCLN has performed better with a 92.03% return vs 6.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OOSP or QCLN?

QCLN is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for OOSP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OOSP or QCLN?

OOSP has the higher dividend yield at 6.45%, compared with 0.16% for QCLN.

What is the main difference between OOSP and QCLN?

OOSP is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while QCLN is Alternative Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Obra and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for OOSP and 0.59% for QCLN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QCLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.