OOSAX vs. RCRIX
OOSAX (Invesco Senior Floating Rate Fund) and RCRIX (RiverPark Floating Rate CMBS Fund) are both Bank Loan funds. Over the past 5 years, OOSAX returned 4.73%/yr vs 5.31%/yr for RCRIX. Their 0.10 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. OOSAX charges 1.04%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for RCRIX.
Performance
OOSAX vs. RCRIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OOSAX achieves a -0.53% return, which is significantly lower than RCRIX's 2.20% return.
OOSAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- 6M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- -0.53%
- 1Y
- 0.01%
- 3Y*
- 5.00%
- 5Y*
- 4.73%
- 10Y*
- 3.51%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.40%
RCRIX
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- 6M
- 1.57%
- YTD
- 2.20%
- 1Y
- 4.34%
- 3Y*
- 6.93%
- 5Y*
- 5.31%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.39%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
OOSAX vs. RCRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OOSAX Invesco Senior Floating Rate Fund | -0.53% | 3.78% | 7.76% | 10.67% | -0.94% | 8.66% | -4.46% | 2.36% | -0.86% | 2.26% |
RCRIX RiverPark Floating Rate CMBS Fund | 2.20% | 5.56% | 10.01% | 9.85% | -0.72% | 2.81% | -8.51% | 4.46% | 59.17% | 3.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between OOSAX and RCRIX is -0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2017 | 0.10 |
The correlation between OOSAX and RCRIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.10 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OOSAX vs. RCRIX — Risk / Return Rank
OOSAX
RCRIX
OOSAX vs. RCRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Senior Floating Rate Fund (OOSAX) and RiverPark Floating Rate CMBS Fund (RCRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OOSAX | RCRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -8.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 4.74 | -3.76 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.05 | 9.68 | -9.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.10 | 104.70 | -104.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OOSAX vs. RCRIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OOSAX drawdown since its inception was -32.12%, which is greater than RCRIX's maximum drawdown of -30.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OOSAX and RCRIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OOSAX | RCRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.12% | -30.00% | -2.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.23% | -0.45% | -2.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.23% | -1.93% | -1.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.52% | -3.75% | -2.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.27% | -0.45% | -0.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.14% | -2.95% | +0.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.49% | 0.04% | +1.45% |
Volatility
OOSAX vs. RCRIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Senior Floating Rate Fund (OOSAX) is 0.28%, while RiverPark Floating Rate CMBS Fund (RCRIX) has a volatility of 0.50%. This indicates that OOSAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RCRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OOSAX | RCRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.28% | 0.50% | -0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.04% | 0.74% | +1.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.07% | 0.89% | +2.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.63% | 1.61% | +2.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.14% | 7.86% | -3.72% |
OOSAX vs. RCRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
OOSAX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than RCRIX's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
OOSAX vs. RCRIX - Dividend Comparison
OOSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, more than RCRIX's 4.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OOSAX Invesco Senior Floating Rate Fund | 4.48% | 6.68% | 8.38% | 7.76% | 7.42% | 4.37% | 4.84% | 5.24% | 4.65% | 4.08% | 4.78% | 4.65% |
RCRIX RiverPark Floating Rate CMBS Fund | 4.37% | 5.30% | 6.85% | 7.90% | 3.80% | 2.34% | 3.16% | 3.36% | 49.16% | 3.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OOSAX and RCRIX have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RCRIX has higher volatility (0.50%) compared to OOSAX (0.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OOSAX dropped -32.12% vs RCRIX's -30.00%.
RCRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.89 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OOSAX and RCRIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer