PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OOSAX vs. LLDYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OOSAX vs. LLDYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Senior Floating Rate Fund (OOSAX) and Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LLDYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OOSAX achieves a -0.83% return, which is significantly lower than LLDYX's 0.52% return. Over the past 10 years, OOSAX has outperformed LLDYX with an annualized return of 3.63%, while LLDYX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.70% annualized return.


OOSAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.62%
YTD
-0.83%
6M
-0.50%
1Y
1.63%
3Y*
5.55%
5Y*
4.85%
10Y*
3.63%

LLDYX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.16%
YTD
0.52%
6M
0.94%
1Y
4.16%
3Y*
5.19%
5Y*
2.33%
10Y*
2.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OOSAX vs. LLDYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OOSAX
Invesco Senior Floating Rate Fund
-0.83%3.78%7.76%10.67%-0.94%8.66%-4.46%2.36%-0.86%3.79%
LLDYX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund
0.52%6.19%5.13%5.41%-5.35%1.07%3.17%5.64%1.47%2.74%

Correlation

The correlation between OOSAX and LLDYX is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2004

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OOSAX vs. LLDYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OOSAX
OOSAX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
OOSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OOSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
OOSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
OOSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
OOSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

LLDYX
LLDYX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
LLDYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LLDYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
LLDYX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
LLDYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
LLDYX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OOSAX vs. LLDYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Senior Floating Rate Fund (OOSAX) and Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LLDYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OOSAXLLDYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.59

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.56

3.25

-2.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.21

12.66

-11.45

OOSAX vs. LLDYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OOSAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the LLDYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OOSAX and LLDYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OOSAX vs. LLDYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OOSAX drawdown since its inception was -32.12%, which is greater than LLDYX's maximum drawdown of -10.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OOSAX and LLDYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OOSAXLLDYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.12%

-10.54%

-21.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.23%

-1.29%

-1.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.23%

-1.29%

-1.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.52%

-7.43%

+0.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.53%

-9.67%

-13.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.57%

-0.52%

-1.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.15%

-1.20%

-0.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.42%

0.33%

+1.09%

Volatility

OOSAX vs. LLDYX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Senior Floating Rate Fund (OOSAX) has a higher volatility of 0.86% compared to Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LLDYX) at 0.73%. This indicates that OOSAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LLDYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OOSAXLLDYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.86%

0.73%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.94%

1.70%

+0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.99%

2.42%

+0.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.61%

2.75%

+0.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.13%

2.60%

+1.53%

OOSAX vs. LLDYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OOSAX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than LLDYX's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

OOSAX vs. LLDYX - Dividend Comparison

OOSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.18%, which matches LLDYX's 5.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LLDYX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund
5.17%5.21%4.73%4.71%2.58%2.52%3.06%3.79%4.11%3.90%4.15%4.15%
OOSAX
Invesco Senior Floating Rate Fund
5.18%6.68%8.38%7.76%7.42%4.37%4.84%5.24%4.65%4.08%4.78%4.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


OOSAX and LLDYX have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OOSAX has higher volatility (0.86%) compared to LLDYX (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OOSAX dropped -32.12% vs LLDYX's -10.54%.

LLDYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OOSAX and LLDYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer