OOMA vs. PENG
OOMA (Ooma, Inc.) and PENG (Penguin Solutions, Inc) are both stocks. OOMA operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services), while PENG operates in Information Technology Services (Technology). Over the past 5 years, OOMA returned 3.23%/yr vs 17.59%/yr for PENG. Their 0.20 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
OOMA vs. PENG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OOMA achieves a 85.42% return, which is significantly lower than PENG's 169.19% return.
OOMA
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- 11.60%
- 6M
- 85.11%
- YTD
- 85.42%
- 1Y
- 96.83%
- 3Y*
- 13.08%
- 5Y*
- 3.23%
- 10Y*
- 9.94%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.46%
PENG
- 1D
- 2.33%
- 1M
- -14.34%
- 6M
- 174.09%
- YTD
- 169.19%
- 1Y
- 130.84%
- 3Y*
- 25.09%
- 5Y*
- 17.59%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 26.68%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
OOMA Ooma, Inc. | $9.14M | $7.51M | $6.86M |
| $177.31M | $330.68M | $244.03M |
OOMA vs. PENG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OOMA Ooma, Inc. | 85.42% | -16.57% | 31.03% | -21.22% | -33.37% | 41.94% | 8.84% | -4.68% | 16.15% | 2.14% |
PENG Penguin Solutions, Inc | 169.19% | 1.93% | 1.37% | 27.22% | -58.08% | 88.65% | -0.82% | 27.74% | -11.87% | 180.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between OOMA and PENG is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2017 | 0.20 |
The correlation between OOMA and PENG shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.23 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
OOMA:
$597.58M
PENG:
$2.70B
OOMA:
$0.33
PENG:
$0.24
OOMA:
66.44
PENG:
219.31
OOMA:
2.11
PENG:
1.42
OOMA:
$289.72M
PENG:
$1.50B
OOMA:
$177.70M
PENG:
$419.76M
OOMA:
$19.00M
PENG:
$125.18M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OOMA vs. PENG — Risk / Return Rank
OOMA
PENG
OOMA vs. PENG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ooma, Inc. (OOMA) and Penguin Solutions, Inc (PENG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OOMA | PENG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.30 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.59 | 2.68 | +1.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.04 | 5.08 | +4.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OOMA vs. PENG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OOMA drawdown since its inception was -72.27%, which is greater than PENG's maximum drawdown of -68.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OOMA and PENG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OOMA | PENG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.27% | -68.72% | -3.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.97% | -46.28% | +26.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.36% | -51.21% | -4.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -71.78% | -65.40% | -6.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.12% | -35.31% | +25.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.01% | -37.06% | +5.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.11% | 24.36% | -15.25% |
Volatility
OOMA vs. PENG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ooma, Inc. (OOMA) is 11.79%, while Penguin Solutions, Inc (PENG) has a volatility of 42.87%. This indicates that OOMA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PENG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OOMA | PENG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.79% | 42.87% | -31.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.57% | 68.58% | -39.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.97% | 79.59% | -36.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.51% | 62.70% | -20.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.49% | 64.39% | -17.90% |
Dividends
OOMA vs. PENG - Dividend Comparison
OOMA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PENG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
OOMA Ooma, Inc. | 0.00% |
PENG Penguin Solutions, Inc | 0.06% |
Financials
OOMA vs. PENG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ooma, Inc. and Penguin Solutions, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
OOMA vs. PENG - Profitability Comparison
OOMA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ooma, Inc. reported a gross profit of 50.67M and revenue of 81.15M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.4%.
PENG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Penguin Solutions, Inc reported a gross profit of 133.70M and revenue of 478.71M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.9%.
OOMA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ooma, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.51M and revenue of 81.15M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.3%.
PENG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Penguin Solutions, Inc reported an operating income of 50.86M and revenue of 478.71M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.6%.
OOMA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ooma, Inc. reported a net income of 2.58M and revenue of 81.15M, resulting in a net margin of 3.2%.
PENG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Penguin Solutions, Inc reported a net income of -42.17M and revenue of 478.71M, resulting in a net margin of -8.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
OOMA and PENG have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PENG has higher volatility (42.87%) compared to OOMA (11.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OOMA dropped -72.27% vs PENG's -68.72%.
OOMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OOMA and PENG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer