PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ONTO vs. FORM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ONTO vs. FORM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO) and FormFactor, Inc. (FORM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ONTO achieves a 63.80% return, which is significantly lower than FORM's 90.39% return. Over the past 10 years, ONTO has outperformed FORM with an annualized return of 29.21%, while FORM has yielded a comparatively lower 26.86% annualized return.


ONTO

1D
3.22%
1M
-15.93%
6M
27.98%
YTD
63.80%
1Y
174.21%
3Y*
28.03%
5Y*
29.84%
10Y*
29.21%
ALL TIME*
15.74%

FORM

1D
0.78%
1M
-14.07%
6M
50.66%
YTD
90.39%
1Y
267.09%
3Y*
41.91%
5Y*
23.30%
10Y*
26.86%
ALL TIME*
7.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$150.07M$169.89M$237.88M
$295.69M$343.45M$385.27M

ONTO vs. FORM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ONTO
Onto Innovation Inc.
63.80%-5.29%9.01%124.56%-32.74%112.89%30.13%33.70%9.67%-0.56%
FORM
FormFactor, Inc.
90.39%26.77%5.49%87.63%-51.38%6.28%65.65%84.32%-9.97%39.73%

Correlation

The correlation between ONTO and FORM is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2003

0.49

Over the past year, ONTO and FORM have become more correlated (0.74) than their long-term average of 0.49, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ONTO:

$12.86B

FORM:

$8.28B

EPS

ONTO:

$2.15

FORM:

$1.46

PE Ratio

ONTO:

120.40

FORM:

72.56

PS Ratio

ONTO:

12.43

FORM:

9.29

PB Ratio

ONTO:

6.06

FORM:

7.60

Total Revenue (TTM)

ONTO:

$1.03B

FORM:

$902.23M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ONTO:

$502.93M

FORM:

$390.27M

EBITDA (TTM)

ONTO:

$177.93M

FORM:

$156.99M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ONTO vs. FORM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ONTO
ONTO Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
ONTO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONTO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONTO Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
ONTO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONTO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

FORM
FORM Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FORM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FORM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FORM Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
FORM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FORM Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ONTO vs. FORM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO) and FormFactor, Inc. (FORM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ONTOFORMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.44

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.11

5.77

-1.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.72

21.16

-4.44

ONTO vs. FORM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ONTO Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is comparable to the FORM Sharpe Ratio of 3.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONTO and FORM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ONTO vs. FORM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONTO drawdown since its inception was -98.56%, which is greater than FORM's maximum drawdown of -92.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONTO and FORM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ONTOFORMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.56%

-92.36%

-6.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.31%

-47.82%

+5.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-62.82%

-62.75%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.82%

-62.75%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.82%

-64.42%

+1.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.67%

-33.60%

+1.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-54.55%

-51.32%

-3.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.38%

13.01%

-2.63%

Volatility

ONTO vs. FORM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO) is 30.94%, while FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) has a volatility of 39.13%. This indicates that ONTO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FORM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ONTOFORMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

30.94%

39.13%

-8.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.48%

67.59%

-12.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.42%

84.44%

-17.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

57.93%

59.91%

-1.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.49%

55.45%

-2.96%

Dividends

ONTO vs. FORM - Dividend Comparison

Neither ONTO nor FORM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

ONTO vs. FORM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Onto Innovation Inc. and FormFactor, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

ONTO vs. FORM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Onto Innovation Inc. and FormFactor, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

ONTO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Onto Innovation Inc. reported a gross profit of 146.39M and revenue of 291.95M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.1%.

FORM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, FormFactor, Inc. reported a gross profit of 109.42M and revenue of 258.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.4%.

ONTO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Onto Innovation Inc. reported an operating income of 33.51M and revenue of 291.95M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.

FORM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, FormFactor, Inc. reported an operating income of 27.31M and revenue of 258.24M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.6%.

ONTO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Onto Innovation Inc. reported a net income of 33.75M and revenue of 291.95M, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.

FORM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, FormFactor, Inc. reported a net income of 56.21M and revenue of 258.24M, resulting in a net margin of 21.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ONTO and FORM have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FORM has higher volatility (39.13%) compared to ONTO (30.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONTO dropped -98.56% vs FORM's -92.36%.

FORM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs 2.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ONTO and FORM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer