PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FORM vs. BRC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FORM vs. BRC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) and Brady Corporation (BRC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FORM achieves a 124.29% return, which is significantly higher than BRC's 12.35% return. Over the past 10 years, FORM has outperformed BRC with an annualized return of 32.72%, while BRC has yielded a comparatively lower 12.52% annualized return.


FORM

1D
8.73%
1M
-8.92%
YTD
124.29%
6M
123.25%
1Y
316.76%
3Y*
58.37%
5Y*
30.30%
10Y*
32.72%

BRC

1D
0.55%
1M
6.54%
YTD
12.35%
6M
12.48%
1Y
27.62%
3Y*
22.87%
5Y*
10.55%
10Y*
12.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FORM vs. BRC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FORM
FormFactor, Inc.
124.29%26.77%5.49%87.63%-51.38%6.28%65.65%84.32%-9.97%39.73%
BRC
Brady Corporation
12.35%7.60%27.69%26.91%-10.91%3.75%-6.00%34.10%17.14%3.23%

Correlation

The correlation between FORM and BRC is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2003

0.39

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FORM:

$9.94B

BRC:

$4.19B

EPS

FORM:

$0.87

BRC:

$4.39

PE Ratio

FORM:

143.58

BRC:

19.94

PS Ratio

FORM:

11.68

BRC:

2.58

PB Ratio

FORM:

9.38

BRC:

3.11

Total Revenue (TTM)

FORM:

$839.78M

BRC:

$1.62B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FORM:

$332.34M

BRC:

$828.93M

EBITDA (TTM)

FORM:

$97.87M

BRC:

$300.10M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FORM vs. BRC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FORM
FORM Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FORM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FORM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FORM Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
FORM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FORM Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

BRC
BRC Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
BRC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRC Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
BRC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRC Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FORM vs. BRC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) and Brady Corporation (BRC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FORMBRCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.68

0.94

+3.74

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.08

1.87

+2.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.22

+0.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

12.37

1.04

+11.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

29.55

3.33

+26.22

FORM vs. BRC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FORM Sharpe Ratio is 4.68, which is higher than the BRC Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FORM and BRC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FORMBRCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.68

0.94

+3.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.42

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.45

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.34

-0.16

Drawdowns

FORM vs. BRC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FORM drawdown since its inception was -92.36%, which is greater than BRC's maximum drawdown of -65.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FORM and BRC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FORMBRCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.36%

-65.62%

-26.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.80%

-26.12%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-62.75%

-26.12%

-36.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.75%

-30.06%

-32.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.42%

-36.21%

-28.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.33%

-8.87%

-10.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.52%

-14.41%

-37.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.80%

8.13%

+2.67%

Volatility

FORM vs. BRC - Volatility Comparison

FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) has a higher volatility of 24.66% compared to Brady Corporation (BRC) at 19.33%. This indicates that FORM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FORMBRCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.66%

19.33%

+5.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.37%

24.02%

+24.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.20%

29.41%

+38.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.61%

25.40%

+30.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.12%

27.64%

+25.48%

Dividends

FORM vs. BRC - Dividend Comparison

FORM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BRC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRC
Brady Corporation
1.11%1.23%1.28%1.58%1.92%1.64%1.65%1.49%1.92%2.17%2.16%3.49%
FORM
FormFactor, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

FORM vs. BRC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FormFactor, Inc. and Brady Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M350.00M400.00M20222023202420252026
226.14M
435.24M
(FORM) Total Revenue
(BRC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FORM vs. BRC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between FormFactor, Inc. and Brady Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
38.4%
51.8%
Portfolio components
FORM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FormFactor, Inc. reported a gross profit of 86.79M and revenue of 226.14M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.4%.

BRC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brady Corporation reported a gross profit of 225.47M and revenue of 435.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.8%.

FORM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FormFactor, Inc. reported an operating income of 16.65M and revenue of 226.14M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.4%.

BRC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brady Corporation reported an operating income of 73.21M and revenue of 435.24M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.8%.

FORM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FormFactor, Inc. reported a net income of 20.38M and revenue of 226.14M, resulting in a net margin of 9.0%.

BRC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brady Corporation reported a net income of 57.80M and revenue of 435.24M, resulting in a net margin of 13.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FORM and BRC have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FORM has higher volatility (24.66%) compared to BRC (19.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FORM dropped -92.36% vs BRC's -65.62%.

FORM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.68 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FORM and BRC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer