PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ONLN vs. EINC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ONLN vs. EINC

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

ONLN (ProShares Online Retail ETF) and EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ONLN is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the ProShares Online Retail Index, while EINC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ONLN returned -7.59%/yr vs 20.86%/yr for EINC. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ONLN charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for EINC.

Performance

ONLN vs. EINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Online Retail ETF (ONLN) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ONLN achieves a -9.47% return, which is significantly lower than EINC's 24.27% return.

ONLN

1D
-3.29%
1M
-6.53%
YTD
-9.47%
6M
-10.04%
1Y
9.08%
3Y*
19.43%
5Y*
-7.59%
10Y*
—

EINC

1D
1.33%
1M
-5.79%
YTD
24.27%
6M
25.77%
1Y
27.21%
3Y*
29.77%
5Y*
20.86%
10Y*
11.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ONLN vs. EINC - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ONLN
ProShares Online Retail ETF		-9.47%33.03%24.85%27.37%-50.07%-25.22%111.82%19.93%-24.66%
EINC
VanEck Energy Income ETF		24.27%7.11%42.79%15.55%19.18%38.05%-19.89%16.98%-17.50%

Correlation

The correlation between ONLN and EINC is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2018

0.30

The correlation between ONLN and EINC shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ONLN vs. EINC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
ONLN
EINC

Consumer Cyclical

95.1%

-

Technology

3.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.6%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Energy

-

99.4%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

2.5%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

0.6%

Consumer Cyclical

ONLN
95.1%
EINC

-

Technology

ONLN
3.3%
EINC

-

Consumer Defensive

ONLN
1.6%
EINC

-

Basic Materials

ONLN

-

EINC

-

Communication Services

ONLN

-

EINC

-

Energy

ONLN

-

EINC
99.4%

Financial Services

ONLN

-

EINC

-

Healthcare

ONLN

-

EINC

-

Industrials

ONLN

-

EINC
2.5%

Real Estate

ONLN

-

EINC

-

Utilities

ONLN

-

EINC
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

ProShares Online Retail ETF

VanEck Energy Income ETF

Often compared with ONLN:
ONLN vs. EBIZONLN vs. IYCONLN vs. FSRPXONLN vs. CHIQONLN vs. SHOP.TOONLN vs. SPYONLN vs. RTH
Often compared with EINC:
EINC vs. XLEEINC vs. BIZDEINC vs. EMLPEINC vs. SMHEINC vs. IXCEINC vs. VPUEINC vs. ERY

Return for Risk

ONLN vs. EINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ONLN
ONLN Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
ONLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONLN Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
ONLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONLN Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
EINC
EINC Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
EINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
EINC Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
EINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
EINC Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ONLN vs. EINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Online Retail ETF (ONLN) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

ONLNEINCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.37
1.82

-1.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.67
2.47

-1.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.32

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.46

3.47

-3.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.10

8.82

-7.73

ONLN vs. EINC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ONLN Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the EINC Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONLN and EINC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ONLN vs. EINC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONLN drawdown since its inception was -71.77%, smaller than the maximum EINC drawdown of -87.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONLN and EINC.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ONLNEINCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.77%

-87.55%

+15.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.75%

-7.89%

-11.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.97%

-16.01%

-11.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.19%

-19.87%

-49.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-68.85%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.38%

-5.79%

-35.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.44%

-44.16%

+8.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.30%

3.09%

+5.21%

Volatility

ONLN vs. EINC - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Online Retail ETF (ONLN) has a higher volatility of 7.41% compared to VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) at 6.32%. This indicates that ONLN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ONLNEINCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.41%

6.32%

+1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.32%

11.86%

+6.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.39%

15.07%

+9.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.15%

19.54%

+13.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.08%

25.43%

+6.65%

ONLN vs. EINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

ONLN has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than EINC's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

ONLN vs. EINC - Dividend Comparison

ONLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than EINC's 3.56% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EINC
VanEck Energy Income ETF		3.56%4.51%3.33%3.77%2.89%6.03%6.69%9.66%11.31%8.53%9.71%28.53%
ONLN
ProShares Online Retail ETF		0.36%0.30%0.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

ONLN and EINC have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ONLN has higher volatility (7.41%) compared to EINC (6.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONLN dropped -71.77% vs EINC's -87.55%.

On 5-year performance, EINC leads with 20.86% vs -7.59% for ONLN. On fees, EINC is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, EINC has been the lower-risk option at 6.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EINC has performed better with a 20.86% return vs -7.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EINC is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for ONLN.

EINC has the higher dividend yield at 3.56%, compared with 0.36% for ONLN.

ONLN is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while EINC is Energy Equities. ONLN tracks ProShares Online Retail Index, while EINC tracks MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for ONLN and 0.45% for EINC.

EINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ONLN and EINC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer