PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ONEZ vs. SMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ONEZ vs. SMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Seasonality Laddered Buffered ETF (ONEZ) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF (SMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ONEZ achieves a 5.97% return, which is significantly higher than SMAX's 4.19% return.


ONEZ

1D
0.51%
1M
-0.11%
6M
5.48%
YTD
5.97%
1Y
12.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.04%

SMAX

1D
0.23%
1M
0.78%
6M
3.60%
YTD
4.19%
1Y
8.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$991.28K$904.44K$2.40M
$86.72K$213.67K$299.05K

ONEZ vs. SMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ONEZ and SMAX is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2025

0.79

The correlation between ONEZ and SMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ONEZ vs. SMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ONEZ
ONEZ Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
ONEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
ONEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

SMAX
SMAX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
SMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ONEZ vs. SMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Seasonality Laddered Buffered ETF (ONEZ) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF (SMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ONEZSMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.63

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

4.31

-2.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.33

22.94

-16.61

ONEZ vs. SMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ONEZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the SMAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONEZ and SMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ONEZ vs. SMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONEZ drawdown since its inception was -13.24%, which is greater than SMAX's maximum drawdown of -3.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEZ and SMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ONEZSMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.24%

-3.90%

-9.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.60%

-1.91%

-4.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.82%

0.00%

-1.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.04%

-0.38%

-1.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.75%

0.36%

+1.39%

Volatility

ONEZ vs. SMAX - Volatility Comparison

TrueShares Seasonality Laddered Buffered ETF (ONEZ) has a higher volatility of 2.38% compared to iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF (SMAX) at 0.77%. This indicates that ONEZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ONEZSMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.38%

0.77%

+1.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.32%

2.16%

+5.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.64%

2.73%

+6.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.71%

3.59%

+8.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.71%

3.59%

+8.12%

ONEZ vs. SMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ONEZ has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than SMAX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

ONEZ vs. SMAX - Dividend Comparison

ONEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, more than SMAX's 0.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
ONEZ
TrueShares Seasonality Laddered Buffered ETF
3.75%3.97%0.00%
SMAX
iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF
0.94%0.98%0.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


ONEZ and SMAX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ONEZ has higher volatility (2.38%) compared to SMAX (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEZ dropped -13.24% vs SMAX's -3.90%.

On 1-year performance, ONEZ leads with 12.92% vs 8.21% for SMAX. On fees, SMAX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SMAX has been the lower-risk option at 0.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ONEZ has performed better with a 12.92% return vs 8.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMAX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for ONEZ.

ONEZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.75%, compared with 0.94% for SMAX.

They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for ONEZ and 0.50% for SMAX.

SMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ONEZ and SMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer