ONEZ vs. APRZ
ONEZ (TrueShares Seasonality Laddered Buffered ETF) and APRZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (April) ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds from TrueShares. ONEZ is actively managed, while APRZ is passively managed. Over the past year, ONEZ returned 17.56% vs 20.17% for APRZ. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ONEZ charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for APRZ.
Performance
ONEZ vs. APRZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ONEZ having a 7.27% return and APRZ slightly higher at 7.43%.
ONEZ
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 3.77%
- YTD
- 7.27%
- 6M
- 7.15%
- 1Y
- 17.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
APRZ
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 4.07%
- YTD
- 7.43%
- 6M
- 7.28%
- 1Y
- 20.17%
- 3Y*
- 16.23%
- 5Y*
- 11.19%
- 10Y*
- —
ONEZ vs. APRZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ONEZ TrueShares Seasonality Laddered Buffered ETF | 7.27% | 8.99% |
APRZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (April) ETF | 7.43% | 11.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between ONEZ and APRZ is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2025 | 0.91 |
The correlation between ONEZ and APRZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ONEZ vs. APRZ — Risk / Return Rank
ONEZ
APRZ
ONEZ vs. APRZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Seasonality Laddered Buffered ETF (ONEZ) and TrueShares Structured Outcome (April) ETF (APRZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ONEZ | APRZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.36 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.67 | 2.29 | +0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.14 | 10.13 | +1.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ONEZ | APRZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91 | 1.98 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.90 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.04 | 0.94 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
ONEZ vs. APRZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ONEZ drawdown since its inception was -13.24%, smaller than the maximum APRZ drawdown of -18.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEZ and APRZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ONEZ | APRZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.24% | -18.15% | +4.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.60% | -8.85% | +2.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.61% | -0.52% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.07% | -3.63% | +1.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.58% | 2.00% | -0.42% |
Volatility
ONEZ vs. APRZ - Volatility Comparison
TrueShares Seasonality Laddered Buffered ETF (ONEZ) has a higher volatility of 2.54% compared to TrueShares Structured Outcome (April) ETF (APRZ) at 2.39%. This indicates that ONEZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APRZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ONEZ | APRZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.54% | 2.39% | +0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.03% | 8.06% | -1.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.23% | 10.23% | -1.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.88% | 12.52% | -0.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.88% | 12.42% | -0.54% |
ONEZ vs. APRZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ONEZ has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than APRZ's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
ONEZ vs. APRZ - Dividend Comparison
ONEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, more than APRZ's 3.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APRZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (April) ETF | 3.12% | 3.35% | 2.78% | 2.89% | 0.59% |
ONEZ TrueShares Seasonality Laddered Buffered ETF | 3.70% | 3.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, ONEZ and APRZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ONEZ has higher volatility (2.54%) compared to APRZ (2.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEZ dropped -13.24% vs APRZ's -18.15%.
On 1-year performance, APRZ leads with 20.17% vs 17.56% for ONEZ. On fees, APRZ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, APRZ has been the lower-risk option at 2.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, APRZ has performed better with a 20.17% return vs 17.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
APRZ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for ONEZ.
ONEZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.70%, compared with 3.12% for APRZ.
Their fees differ too: 0.98% for ONEZ and 0.79% for APRZ.
APRZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ONEZ and APRZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer