PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ONEZ vs. APRZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ONEZ vs. APRZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Seasonality Laddered Buffered ETF (ONEZ) and TrueShares Structured Outcome (April) ETF (APRZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ONEZ having a 7.27% return and APRZ slightly higher at 7.43%.


ONEZ

1D
-0.47%
1M
3.77%
YTD
7.27%
6M
7.15%
1Y
17.56%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

APRZ

1D
-0.52%
1M
4.07%
YTD
7.43%
6M
7.28%
1Y
20.17%
3Y*
16.23%
5Y*
11.19%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ONEZ vs. APRZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ONEZ and APRZ is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2025

0.91

The correlation between ONEZ and APRZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ONEZ vs. APRZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ONEZ
ONEZ Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
ONEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
ONEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

APRZ
APRZ Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
APRZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APRZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
APRZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
APRZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
APRZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ONEZ vs. APRZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Seasonality Laddered Buffered ETF (ONEZ) and TrueShares Structured Outcome (April) ETF (APRZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ONEZAPRZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.36

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

2.29

+0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.14

10.13

+1.01

ONEZ vs. APRZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ONEZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the APRZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONEZ and APRZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ONEZAPRZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

1.98

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.04

0.94

+0.10

Drawdowns

ONEZ vs. APRZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONEZ drawdown since its inception was -13.24%, smaller than the maximum APRZ drawdown of -18.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEZ and APRZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ONEZAPRZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.24%

-18.15%

+4.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.60%

-8.85%

+2.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.61%

-0.52%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.07%

-3.63%

+1.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.58%

2.00%

-0.42%

Volatility

ONEZ vs. APRZ - Volatility Comparison

TrueShares Seasonality Laddered Buffered ETF (ONEZ) has a higher volatility of 2.54% compared to TrueShares Structured Outcome (April) ETF (APRZ) at 2.39%. This indicates that ONEZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APRZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ONEZAPRZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.54%

2.39%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.03%

8.06%

-1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.23%

10.23%

-1.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.88%

12.52%

-0.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.88%

12.42%

-0.54%

ONEZ vs. APRZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ONEZ has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than APRZ's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

ONEZ vs. APRZ - Dividend Comparison

ONEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, more than APRZ's 3.12% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
APRZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (April) ETF
3.12%3.35%2.78%2.89%0.59%
ONEZ
TrueShares Seasonality Laddered Buffered ETF
3.70%3.97%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, ONEZ and APRZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ONEZ has higher volatility (2.54%) compared to APRZ (2.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEZ dropped -13.24% vs APRZ's -18.15%.

On 1-year performance, APRZ leads with 20.17% vs 17.56% for ONEZ. On fees, APRZ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, APRZ has been the lower-risk option at 2.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, APRZ has performed better with a 20.17% return vs 17.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

APRZ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for ONEZ.

ONEZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.70%, compared with 3.12% for APRZ.

Their fees differ too: 0.98% for ONEZ and 0.79% for APRZ.

APRZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ONEZ and APRZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer