ONEV vs. TAIL
ONEV (SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF) and TAIL (Cambria Tail Risk ETF) are both Volatility Hedged Equity funds. ONEV is passively managed, while TAIL is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, ONEV returned 7.83%/yr vs -8.38%/yr for TAIL. At a correlation of -0.56, they often move in opposite directions. ONEV charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for TAIL.
Performance
ONEV vs. TAIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ONEV achieves a 6.31% return, which is significantly higher than TAIL's -6.17% return.
ONEV
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 2.36%
- YTD
- 6.31%
- 6M
- 6.47%
- 1Y
- 12.08%
- 3Y*
- 12.79%
- 5Y*
- 7.83%
- 10Y*
- 11.19%
TAIL
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -2.15%
- YTD
- -6.17%
- 6M
- -7.55%
- 1Y
- -8.73%
- 3Y*
- -5.76%
- 5Y*
- -8.38%
- 10Y*
- —
ONEV vs. TAIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ONEV SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF | 6.31% | 8.14% | 11.76% | 13.28% | -8.15% | 29.19% | 6.66% | 30.66% | -5.30% | 8.71% |
TAIL Cambria Tail Risk ETF | -6.17% | 5.48% | -9.62% | -13.29% | -13.13% | -12.81% | 6.91% | -14.27% | 2.85% | -7.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between ONEV and TAIL is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2017 | -0.56 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between ONEV and TAIL has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.56 to -0.25, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.
ONEV vs. TAIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ONEV
TAIL
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Technology
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Industrials
ONEV
TAIL
Healthcare
ONEV
TAIL
Consumer Cyclical
ONEV
TAIL
Financial Services
ONEV
TAIL
Technology
ONEV
TAIL
Utilities
ONEV
TAIL
Consumer Defensive
ONEV
TAIL
Real Estate
ONEV
TAIL
Basic Materials
ONEV
TAIL
Communication Services
ONEV
TAIL
Energy
ONEV
TAIL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ONEV vs. TAIL — Risk / Return Rank
ONEV
TAIL
ONEV vs. TAIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) and Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ONEV | TAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.08 | -1.03 | +2.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.67 | -1.46 | +3.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 0.83 | +0.36 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.57 | -0.80 | +2.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.34 | -2.01 | +7.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ONEV | TAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | -1.03 | +2.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | -0.57 | +1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | -0.48 | +1.15 |
Drawdowns
ONEV vs. TAIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ONEV drawdown since its inception was -39.72%, smaller than the maximum TAIL drawdown of -52.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEV and TAIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ONEV | TAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.72% | -52.36% | +12.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.75% | -10.95% | +3.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.81% | -20.65% | +5.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.52% | -38.44% | +19.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.99% | -51.56% | +50.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.90% | -29.12% | +25.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.27% | 4.35% | -2.08% |
Volatility
ONEV vs. TAIL - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) has a higher volatility of 2.63% compared to Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL) at 0.86%. This indicates that ONEV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TAIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ONEV | TAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.63% | 0.86% | +1.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.73% | 6.45% | +1.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.20% | 8.51% | +2.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.54% | 14.90% | -0.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.02% | 14.94% | +2.08% |
ONEV vs. TAIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ONEV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than TAIL's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
ONEV vs. TAIL - Dividend Comparison
ONEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than TAIL's 3.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ONEV SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF | 1.76% | 1.81% | 1.88% | 1.79% | 1.80% | 1.44% | 1.87% | 2.07% | 2.14% | 6.91% | 3.73% | 0.21% |
TAIL Cambria Tail Risk ETF | 3.49% | 2.88% | 3.48% | 3.74% | 1.50% | 0.49% | 0.36% | 1.58% | 1.52% | 0.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ONEV and TAIL have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ONEV has higher volatility (2.63%) compared to TAIL (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEV dropped -39.72% vs TAIL's -52.36%.
On 5-year performance, ONEV leads with 7.83% vs -8.38% for TAIL. On fees, ONEV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, TAIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ONEV has performed better with a 7.83% return vs -8.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ONEV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for TAIL.
TAIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 1.76% for ONEV.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ONEV and 0.59% for TAIL.
ONEV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ONEV and TAIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer