ONEV vs. JULZ

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

ONEV (SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF) and JULZ (Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ONEV is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focused Factor (TR), while JULZ is a Options Trading fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index July. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ONEV returned 8.46%/yr vs 10.44%/yr for JULZ. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ONEV charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for JULZ.

Performance

ONEV vs. JULZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) and Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF (JULZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ONEV achieves a 8.04% return, which is significantly higher than JULZ's 5.81% return.

ONEV

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: 2.08%
• YTD: 8.04%
• 6M: 6.69%
• 1Y: 13.02%
• 3Y*: 12.94%
• 5Y*: 8.46%
• 10Y*: 11.55%

JULZ

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: -1.68%
• YTD: 5.81%
• 6M: 4.69%
• 1Y: 16.64%
• 3Y*: 15.30%
• 5Y*: 10.44%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ONEV vs. JULZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ONEV SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF	8.04%	8.14%	11.76%	13.28%	-8.15%	29.19%	23.36%
JULZ Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF	5.81%	13.23%	18.76%	17.65%	-9.34%	20.66%	16.18%

Correlation

The correlation between ONEV and JULZ is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2020	0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between ONEV and JULZ has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

ONEV vs. JULZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ONEV

ONEV Risk / Return Rank: 37
ONEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
ONEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
ONEV Omega Ratio Rank: 32
ONEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
ONEV Martin Ratio Rank: 40

JULZ

JULZ Risk / Return Rank: 50
JULZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
JULZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
JULZ Omega Ratio Rank: 50
JULZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
JULZ Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ONEV vs. JULZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) and Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF (JULZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ONEV	JULZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.16	1.56	-0.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.77	2.17	-0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.28	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.69	1.96	-0.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.74	8.25	-2.51

ONEV vs. JULZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ONEV Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is comparable to the JULZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONEV and JULZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ONEV vs. JULZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONEV drawdown since its inception was -39.72%, which is greater than JULZ's maximum drawdown of -14.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEV and JULZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	ONEV	JULZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.72%	-14.71%	-25.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.75%	-8.53%	+0.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.81%	-14.71%	-0.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.52%	-14.71%	-3.81%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.72%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.65%	-3.25%	+2.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.88%	-2.97%	-0.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.27%	2.02%	+0.25%

Volatility

ONEV vs. JULZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) is 2.89%, while Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF (JULZ) has a volatility of 4.08%. This indicates that ONEV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JULZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ONEV	JULZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.89%	4.08%	-1.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.91%	8.76%	-0.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.31%	10.76%	+0.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.53%	12.29%	+2.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.03%	12.36%	+4.67%

ONEV vs. JULZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ONEV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than JULZ's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

ONEV vs. JULZ - Dividend Comparison

ONEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, less than JULZ's 11.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JULZ Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF	11.31%	11.96%	3.30%	3.59%	0.07%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ONEV SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF	1.87%	1.81%	1.88%	1.79%	1.80%	1.44%	1.87%	2.07%	2.14%	6.91%	3.73%	0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ONEV and JULZ in my portfolio?

ONEV and JULZ have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ONEV or JULZ?

JULZ has higher volatility (4.08%) compared to ONEV (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEV dropped -39.72% vs JULZ's -14.71%.

Which ETF is better, ONEV or JULZ?

On 5-year performance, JULZ leads with 10.44% vs 8.46% for ONEV. On fees, ONEV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ONEV has been the lower-risk option at 2.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ONEV or JULZ?

Over the 5-year period, JULZ has performed better with a 10.44% return vs 8.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ONEV or JULZ?

ONEV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for JULZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ONEV or JULZ?

JULZ has the higher dividend yield at 11.31%, compared with 1.87% for ONEV.

What is the main difference between ONEV and JULZ?

ONEV is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while JULZ is Options Trading. ONEV tracks Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focused Factor (TR), while JULZ tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index July. They also come from different issuers: State Street and TrueShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ONEV and 0.79% for JULZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JULZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.