^GSPC vs. XLP

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP).

XLP is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Consumer Staples Select Sector. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998.

Performance

^GSPC vs. XLP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

^GSPC vs. XLP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
^GSPC S&P 500 Index	-4.63%	16.39%	23.31%	24.23%	-19.44%	26.89%	16.26%	28.88%	-6.24%	19.42%
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF	6.13%	1.52%	12.20%	-0.82%	-0.81%	17.20%	10.11%	27.43%	-8.07%	12.98%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^GSPC achieves a -4.63% return, which is significantly lower than XLP's 6.13% return. Over the past 10 years, ^GSPC has outperformed XLP with an annualized return of 12.16%, while XLP has yielded a comparatively lower 7.17% annualized return.

^GSPC

• 1D: 2.91%
• 1M: -5.09%
• YTD: -4.63%
• 6M: -2.39%
• 1Y: 16.33%
• 3Y*: 16.69%
• 5Y*: 10.18%
• 10Y*: 12.16%

XLP

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: -8.41%
• YTD: 6.13%
• 6M: 6.04%
• 1Y: 3.16%
• 3Y*: 5.99%
• 5Y*: 6.59%
• 10Y*: 7.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

^GSPC vs. XLP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^GSPC

^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 74
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 76
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 85

XLP

XLP Risk / Return Rank: 20
XLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
XLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
XLP Omega Ratio Rank: 17
XLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
XLP Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^GSPC vs. XLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	^GSPC	XLP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.90	0.23	+0.67
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.39	0.42	+0.96
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.05	+0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.40	0.49	+0.91
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.61	1.19	+5.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

^GSPC vs. XLP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is higher than the XLP Sharpe Ratio of 0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^GSPC and XLP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	^GSPC	XLP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90	0.23	+0.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61	0.50	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68	0.49	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	0.44	+0.02

Correlation

The correlation between ^GSPC and XLP is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Drawdowns

^GSPC vs. XLP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^GSPC drawdown since its inception was -56.78%, which is greater than XLP's maximum drawdown of -35.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^GSPC and XLP.

Drawdown Indicators

	^GSPC	XLP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.78%	-35.90%	-20.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.14%	-9.69%	-2.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.43%	-16.30%	-9.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.92%	-24.51%	-9.41%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.45%	-8.41%	+1.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.75%	-7.06%	-3.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.57%	4.03%	-1.46%

Volatility

^GSPC vs. XLP - Volatility Comparison

S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) has a higher volatility of 5.34% compared to State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) at 3.93%. This indicates that ^GSPC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	^GSPC	XLP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.34%	3.93%	+1.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.54%	9.34%	+0.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.33%	13.90%	+4.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.91%	13.14%	+3.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.05%	14.69%	+3.36%