PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ONEO vs. VFMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ONEO vs. VFMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO) and Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ONEO achieves a 17.96% return, which is significantly lower than VFMO's 24.71% return.


ONEO

1D
0.09%
1M
5.26%
YTD
17.96%
6M
18.18%
1Y
28.01%
3Y*
19.64%
5Y*
10.52%
10Y*
11.86%

VFMO

1D
0.84%
1M
4.64%
YTD
24.71%
6M
22.49%
1Y
44.76%
3Y*
28.43%
5Y*
14.03%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ONEO vs. VFMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ONEO
SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF
17.96%10.61%15.01%15.64%-12.01%26.72%10.76%26.53%-13.33%
VFMO
Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF
24.71%17.39%26.14%16.25%-12.84%19.16%31.36%28.22%-11.41%

Correlation

The correlation between ONEO and VFMO is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2018

0.88

The correlation between ONEO and VFMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

ONEO vs. VFMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ONEO
VFMO

Technology

21.9%
17.5%

Industrials

18.0%
24.7%

Consumer Cyclical

11.6%
8.7%

Healthcare

9.5%
22.9%

Financial Services

9.4%
6.5%

Energy

7.3%
7.3%

Utilities

5.8%
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
2.5%

Basic Materials

4.7%
6.4%

Communication Services

3.6%
3.4%

Real Estate

2.9%
0.1%

Technology

ONEO
21.9%
VFMO
17.5%

Industrials

ONEO
18.0%
VFMO
24.7%

Consumer Cyclical

ONEO
11.6%
VFMO
8.7%

Healthcare

ONEO
9.5%
VFMO
22.9%

Financial Services

ONEO
9.4%
VFMO
6.5%

Energy

ONEO
7.3%
VFMO
7.3%

Utilities

ONEO
5.8%
VFMO
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

ONEO
5.4%
VFMO
2.5%

Basic Materials

ONEO
4.7%
VFMO
6.4%

Communication Services

ONEO
3.6%
VFMO
3.4%

Real Estate

ONEO
2.9%
VFMO
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ONEO vs. VFMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ONEO
ONEO Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
ONEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONEO Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
ONEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONEO Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

VFMO
VFMO Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
VFMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFMO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
VFMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ONEO vs. VFMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO) and Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ONEOVFMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.36

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.82

4.09

-0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.14

15.46

-0.33

ONEO vs. VFMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ONEO Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the VFMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONEO and VFMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ONEOVFMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20

2.12

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.65

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.66

-0.04

Drawdowns

ONEO vs. VFMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONEO drawdown since its inception was -40.86%, which is greater than VFMO's maximum drawdown of -36.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEO and VFMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ONEOVFMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.86%

-36.77%

-4.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.37%

-10.98%

+3.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.72%

-24.40%

+4.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.39%

-25.80%

+3.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.99%

-7.76%

+2.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

2.90%

-1.04%

Volatility

ONEO vs. VFMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO) is 3.67%, while Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO) has a volatility of 6.05%. This indicates that ONEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VFMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ONEOVFMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.67%

6.05%

-2.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.66%

16.38%

-6.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.81%

21.21%

-8.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.21%

21.70%

-4.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.66%

23.56%

-4.90%

ONEO vs. VFMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ONEO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VFMO's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ONEO vs. VFMO - Dividend Comparison

ONEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, more than VFMO's 0.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ONEO
SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF
1.16%1.29%1.30%1.56%1.73%1.19%1.28%1.64%1.72%7.69%1.82%0.17%
VFMO
Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF
0.62%0.82%0.72%0.89%1.72%0.81%0.45%1.22%0.70%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ONEO and VFMO have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VFMO has higher volatility (6.05%) compared to ONEO (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEO dropped -40.86% vs VFMO's -36.77%.

On 5-year performance, VFMO leads with 14.03% vs 10.52% for ONEO. On fees, VFMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, ONEO has been the lower-risk option at 3.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VFMO has performed better with a 14.03% return vs 10.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VFMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ONEO.

ONEO has the higher dividend yield at 1.16%, compared with 0.62% for VFMO.

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ONEO and 0.13% for VFMO.

ONEO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ONEO and VFMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer