PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ONEO vs. UEVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ONEO vs. UEVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO) and VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ONEO achieves a 17.85% return, which is significantly higher than UEVM's 8.99% return.


ONEO

1D
0.19%
1M
6.36%
YTD
17.85%
6M
18.38%
1Y
27.50%
3Y*
19.36%
5Y*
10.50%
10Y*
11.94%

UEVM

1D
-1.86%
1M
0.77%
YTD
8.99%
6M
8.31%
1Y
24.92%
3Y*
18.34%
5Y*
7.55%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ONEO vs. UEVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ONEO
SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF
17.85%10.61%15.01%15.64%-12.01%26.72%10.76%26.53%-12.41%5.15%
UEVM
VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF
8.99%22.74%11.92%17.41%-14.60%11.09%3.77%10.71%-16.96%3.70%

Correlation

The correlation between ONEO and UEVM is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017

0.62

The correlation between ONEO and UEVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

ONEO vs. UEVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ONEO
UEVM

Technology

21.9%
15.5%

Industrials

18.0%
8.7%

Consumer Cyclical

11.6%
5.0%

Healthcare

9.5%
4.4%

Financial Services

9.4%
17.7%

Energy

7.3%
5.2%

Utilities

5.8%
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
5.5%

Basic Materials

4.7%
4.6%

Communication Services

3.6%
2.0%

Real Estate

2.9%
2.8%

Technology

ONEO
21.9%
UEVM
15.5%

Industrials

ONEO
18.0%
UEVM
8.7%

Consumer Cyclical

ONEO
11.6%
UEVM
5.0%

Healthcare

ONEO
9.5%
UEVM
4.4%

Financial Services

ONEO
9.4%
UEVM
17.7%

Energy

ONEO
7.3%
UEVM
5.2%

Utilities

ONEO
5.8%
UEVM
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

ONEO
5.4%
UEVM
5.5%

Basic Materials

ONEO
4.7%
UEVM
4.6%

Communication Services

ONEO
3.6%
UEVM
2.0%

Real Estate

ONEO
2.9%
UEVM
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ONEO vs. UEVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ONEO
ONEO Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
ONEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONEO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
ONEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONEO Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

UEVM
UEVM Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
UEVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UEVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
UEVM Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
UEVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
UEVM Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ONEO vs. UEVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO) and VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ONEOUEVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.30

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.75

2.56

+1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.86

8.65

+6.21

ONEO vs. UEVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ONEO Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is higher than the UEVM Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONEO and UEVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ONEOUEVMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

1.65

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.48

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.33

+0.30

Drawdowns

ONEO vs. UEVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONEO drawdown since its inception was -40.86%, smaller than the maximum UEVM drawdown of -45.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEO and UEVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ONEOUEVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.86%

-45.44%

+4.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.37%

-9.79%

+2.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.72%

-18.88%

-0.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.39%

-26.98%

+4.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.18%

+2.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.00%

-11.67%

+6.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

2.89%

-1.03%

Volatility

ONEO vs. UEVM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO) is 3.77%, while VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM) has a volatility of 5.15%. This indicates that ONEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UEVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ONEOUEVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.77%

5.15%

-1.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.66%

12.13%

-2.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.84%

15.18%

-2.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.22%

15.90%

+1.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.66%

18.39%

+0.27%

ONEO vs. UEVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

ONEO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than UEVM's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

ONEO vs. UEVM - Dividend Comparison

ONEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than UEVM's 3.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ONEO
SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF
1.16%1.29%1.30%1.56%1.73%1.19%1.28%1.64%1.72%7.69%1.82%0.17%
UEVM
VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF
3.05%4.02%5.65%4.71%3.46%4.49%2.19%2.79%2.34%0.79%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ONEO and UEVM have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UEVM has higher volatility (5.15%) compared to ONEO (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEO dropped -40.86% vs UEVM's -45.44%.

On 5-year performance, ONEO leads with 10.50% vs 7.55% for UEVM. On fees, ONEO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ONEO has been the lower-risk option at 3.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ONEO has performed better with a 10.50% return vs 7.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ONEO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for UEVM.

UEVM has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 1.16% for ONEO.

ONEO tracks Russell 1000 Momentum Focused Factor Index, while UEVM tracks Nasdaq Victory Emerging Market Value Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ONEO and 0.45% for UEVM.

ONEO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ONEO and UEVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer