PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ONEO vs. PTMC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ONEO vs. PTMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO) and Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ONEO achieves a 17.96% return, which is significantly higher than PTMC's 14.52% return. Over the past 10 years, ONEO has outperformed PTMC with an annualized return of 11.86%, while PTMC has yielded a comparatively lower 6.14% annualized return.


ONEO

1D
0.09%
1M
5.26%
YTD
17.96%
6M
18.18%
1Y
28.01%
3Y*
19.64%
5Y*
10.52%
10Y*
11.86%

PTMC

1D
0.39%
1M
2.95%
YTD
14.52%
6M
14.17%
1Y
19.55%
3Y*
10.29%
5Y*
3.87%
10Y*
6.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ONEO vs. PTMC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ONEO
SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF
17.96%10.61%15.01%15.64%-12.01%26.72%10.76%26.53%-12.41%21.16%
PTMC
Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF
14.52%-1.55%13.22%7.29%-13.99%12.42%6.58%1.04%0.02%17.79%

Correlation

The correlation between ONEO and PTMC is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.73

The correlation between ONEO and PTMC shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (all time) to 0.92 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ONEO vs. PTMC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ONEO
PTMC

Technology

21.9%
16.4%

Industrials

18.0%
23.6%

Consumer Cyclical

11.6%
10.8%

Healthcare

9.5%
8.8%

Financial Services

9.4%
15.1%

Energy

7.3%
4.2%

Utilities

5.8%
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
4.8%

Basic Materials

4.7%
4.9%

Communication Services

3.6%
1.4%

Real Estate

2.9%
7.0%

Technology

ONEO
21.9%
PTMC
16.4%

Industrials

ONEO
18.0%
PTMC
23.6%

Consumer Cyclical

ONEO
11.6%
PTMC
10.8%

Healthcare

ONEO
9.5%
PTMC
8.8%

Financial Services

ONEO
9.4%
PTMC
15.1%

Energy

ONEO
7.3%
PTMC
4.2%

Utilities

ONEO
5.8%
PTMC
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

ONEO
5.4%
PTMC
4.8%

Basic Materials

ONEO
4.7%
PTMC
4.9%

Communication Services

ONEO
3.6%
PTMC
1.4%

Real Estate

ONEO
2.9%
PTMC
7.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ONEO vs. PTMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ONEO
ONEO Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
ONEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONEO Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
ONEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONEO Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

PTMC
PTMC Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
PTMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTMC Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
PTMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTMC Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ONEO vs. PTMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO) and Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ONEOPTMCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.24

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.82

2.21

+1.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.14

8.09

+7.04

ONEO vs. PTMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ONEO Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is higher than the PTMC Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONEO and PTMC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ONEOPTMCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20

1.29

+0.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.30

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.47

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.51

+0.11

Drawdowns

ONEO vs. PTMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONEO drawdown since its inception was -40.86%, which is greater than PTMC's maximum drawdown of -20.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEO and PTMC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ONEOPTMCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.86%

-20.53%

-20.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.37%

-8.89%

+1.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.72%

-15.31%

-4.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.39%

-16.93%

-5.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.86%

-20.53%

-20.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.99%

-6.47%

+1.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

2.42%

-0.56%

Volatility

ONEO vs. PTMC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO) is 3.67%, while Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC) has a volatility of 4.28%. This indicates that ONEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ONEOPTMCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.67%

4.28%

-0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.66%

11.43%

-1.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.81%

15.17%

-2.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.21%

13.15%

+4.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.66%

12.98%

+5.68%

ONEO vs. PTMC - Expense Ratio Comparison

ONEO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than PTMC's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

ONEO vs. PTMC - Dividend Comparison

ONEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than PTMC's 1.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ONEO
SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF
1.16%1.29%1.30%1.56%1.73%1.19%1.28%1.64%1.72%7.69%1.82%0.17%
PTMC
Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF
1.61%1.84%0.87%1.92%0.82%0.12%0.53%1.40%0.89%0.67%0.66%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, ONEO and PTMC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PTMC has higher volatility (4.28%) compared to ONEO (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEO dropped -40.86% vs PTMC's -20.53%.

On 10-year performance, ONEO leads with 11.86% vs 6.14% for PTMC. On fees, ONEO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ONEO has been the lower-risk option at 3.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ONEO has performed better with a 11.86% return vs 6.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ONEO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTMC.

PTMC has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 1.16% for ONEO.

ONEO is categorized as Momentum, while PTMC is Mid Cap Blend Equities. ONEO tracks Russell 1000 Momentum Focused Factor Index, while PTMC tracks Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ONEO and 0.60% for PTMC.

ONEO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ONEO and PTMC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer