ONEB.TO vs. CINF.TO
ONEB.TO (CI North American Core Plus Bond ETF) and CINF.TO (CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool) are both exchange-traded funds - ONEB.TO is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by CI, while CINF.TO is a Utilities Equities fund actively managed by CI. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, ONEB.TO returned 1.72%/yr vs 12.24%/yr for CINF.TO. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ONEB.TO vs. CINF.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ONEB.TO achieves a 0.98% return, which is significantly lower than CINF.TO's 17.05% return.
ONEB.TO
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -0.33%
- 6M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 0.98%
- 1Y
- 3.31%
- 3Y*
- 4.25%
- 5Y*
- 1.72%
- 10Y*
- —
CINF.TO
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -0.38%
- 6M
- 13.71%
- YTD
- 17.05%
- 1Y
- 21.62%
- 3Y*
- 16.65%
- 5Y*
- 12.24%
- 10Y*
- —
ONEB.TO vs. CINF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ONEB.TO CI North American Core Plus Bond ETF | 0.98% | 2.57% | 5.27% | 5.08% | -4.32% | -2.01% | 3.53% |
CINF.TO CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool | 17.05% | 12.54% | 16.53% | 5.27% | 5.03% | 13.56% | 7.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between ONEB.TO and CINF.TO is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2020 | 0.13 |
The correlation between ONEB.TO and CINF.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ONEB.TO vs. CINF.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ONEB.TO
CINF.TO
ONEB.TO vs. CINF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI North American Core Plus Bond ETF (ONEB.TO) and CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool (CINF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ONEB.TO | CINF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.41 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | 4.09 | -2.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.73 | 12.09 | -7.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ONEB.TO vs. CINF.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ONEB.TO drawdown since its inception was -11.25%, smaller than the maximum CINF.TO drawdown of -12.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEB.TO and CINF.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ONEB.TO | CINF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.25% | -12.27% | +1.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.79% | -5.31% | +3.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.79% | -9.62% | +7.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.60% | -12.27% | +4.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.53% | -1.07% | +0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.02% | -2.05% | +0.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.70% | 1.79% | -1.09% |
Volatility
ONEB.TO vs. CINF.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CI North American Core Plus Bond ETF (ONEB.TO) is 0.93%, while CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool (CINF.TO) has a volatility of 2.03%. This indicates that ONEB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CINF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ONEB.TO | CINF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.93% | 2.03% | -1.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.16% | 7.75% | -5.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.85% | 9.56% | -6.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.46% | 11.96% | -8.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.42% | 12.07% | -6.65% |
Dividends
ONEB.TO vs. CINF.TO - Dividend Comparison
ONEB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.95%, more than CINF.TO's 2.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CINF.TO CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool | 2.42% | 2.80% | 3.06% | 3.45% | 3.51% | 3.56% | 2.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ONEB.TO CI North American Core Plus Bond ETF | 2.95% | 2.48% | 2.73% | 2.74% | 2.72% | 1.89% | 2.60% | 2.14% | 0.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ONEB.TO and CINF.TO have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ONEB.TO is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while CINF.TO is Utilities Equities.
Find the right allocation for ONEB.TO and CINF.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer