ONDS vs. AMZN.NEO
ONDS (Ondas Holdings Inc.) and AMZN.NEO (Amazon.com CDR) are both stocks. ONDS operates in Communication Equipment (Technology), while AMZN.NEO operates in Internet Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 3 years, ONDS returned 109.79%/yr vs 20.59%/yr for AMZN.NEO. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ONDS vs. AMZN.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ONDS is traded in USD, while AMZN.NEO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the AMZN.NEO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ONDS achieves a -2.56% return, which is significantly lower than AMZN.NEO's 3.42% return.
ONDS
- 1D
- 1.93%
- 1M
- -10.45%
- YTD
- -2.56%
- 6M
- 23.67%
- 1Y
- 422.53%
- 3Y*
- 109.79%
- 5Y*
- 4.12%
- 10Y*
- —
AMZN.NEO
- 1D
- 3.21%
- 1M
- -8.64%
- YTD
- 3.42%
- 6M
- 7.46%
- 1Y
- 10.17%
- 3Y*
- 20.59%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ONDS vs. AMZN.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ONDS Ondas Holdings Inc. | -2.56% | 281.25% | 67.32% | -3.77% | -76.30% | -15.38% |
AMZN.NEO Amazon.com CDR | 3.42% | 7.60% | 30.75% | 83.07% | -53.72% | -11.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between ONDS and AMZN.NEO is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2021 | 0.30 |
The correlation between ONDS and AMZN.NEO shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ONDS:
$1.54
AMZN.NEO:
$7.17
ONDS:
6.18
AMZN.NEO:
2.82
ONDS:
15.56
AMZN.NEO:
0.31
ONDS:
$96.60M
AMZN.NEO:
$691.33B
ONDS:
$43.33M
AMZN.NEO:
$345.98B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ONDS vs. AMZN.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
ONDS
AMZN.NEO
ONDS vs. AMZN.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ondas Holdings Inc. (ONDS) and Amazon.com CDR (AMZN.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ONDS | AMZN.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.08 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.98 | 0.48 | +7.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.70 | 1.13 | +16.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ONDS vs. AMZN.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ONDS drawdown since its inception was -98.28%, which is greater than AMZN.NEO's maximum drawdown of -60.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONDS and AMZN.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ONDS | AMZN.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.28% | -60.05% | -38.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.37% | -21.08% | -32.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -83.28% | -29.25% | -54.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.23% | -13.38% | -37.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.40% | -21.80% | -49.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.10% | 9.05% | +15.05% |
Volatility
ONDS vs. AMZN.NEO - Volatility Comparison
Ondas Holdings Inc. (ONDS) has a higher volatility of 36.79% compared to Amazon.com CDR (AMZN.NEO) at 8.64%. This indicates that ONDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMZN.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ONDS | AMZN.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 36.79% | 8.64% | +28.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 77.89% | 20.94% | +56.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 126.76% | 30.46% | +96.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 113.81% | 36.02% | +77.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 120.70% | 36.02% | +84.68% |
Dividends
ONDS vs. AMZN.NEO - Dividend Comparison
Neither ONDS nor AMZN.NEO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
ONDS vs. AMZN.NEO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ondas Holdings Inc. and Amazon.com CDR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
ONDS and AMZN.NEO have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for ONDS and AMZN.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer