ONDL vs. QTAP
ONDL (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ONDS ETF) and QTAP (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April) are both Leveraged Equities funds. ONDL is passively managed, while QTAP is actively managed. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ONDL charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTAP.
Performance
ONDL vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ONDL achieves a -79.38% return, which is significantly lower than QTAP's 13.89% return.
ONDL
- 1D
- -11.56%
- 1M
- -52.66%
- 6M
- -87.18%
- YTD
- -79.38%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTAP
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- 6M
- 13.32%
- YTD
- 13.89%
- 1Y
- 20.69%
- 3Y*
- 18.98%
- 5Y*
- 12.67%
- 10Y*
- —
ONDL vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ONDL Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ONDS ETF | -79.38% | 30.85% |
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 13.89% | -0.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between ONDL and QTAP is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2025 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ONDL vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank
ONDL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QTAP
ONDL vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ONDS ETF (ONDL) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ONDL | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.81 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 8.34 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 42.65 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ONDL vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ONDL drawdown since its inception was -89.36%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONDL and QTAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ONDL | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.36% | -29.44% | -59.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -89.36% | -0.78% | -88.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.65% | -4.94% | -53.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.49% | — |
Volatility
ONDL vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ONDL | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.45% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.24% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 207.63% | 6.23% | +201.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 207.63% | 18.92% | +188.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 207.63% | 18.62% | +189.01% |
ONDL vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
ONDL has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
ONDL vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison
Neither ONDL nor QTAP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ONDL and QTAP have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for ONDL.
ONDL and QTAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for ONDL and 0.79% for QTAP.
Find the right allocation for ONDL and QTAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer