PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OMC vs. GPN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

OMC vs. GPN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Omnicom Group Inc. (OMC) and Global Payments Inc. (GPN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OMC achieves a -3.07% return, which is significantly higher than GPN's -11.90% return. Over the past 10 years, OMC has outperformed GPN with an annualized return of 2.86%, while GPN has yielded a comparatively lower -0.28% annualized return.


OMC

1D
1.44%
1M
4.39%
YTD
-3.07%
6M
-1.50%
1Y
12.04%
3Y*
-3.71%
5Y*
1.80%
10Y*
2.86%

GPN

1D
3.87%
1M
1.43%
YTD
-11.90%
6M
-16.89%
1Y
-12.09%
3Y*
-11.36%
5Y*
-18.15%
10Y*
-0.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OMC vs. GPN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OMC
Omnicom Group Inc.
-3.07%-2.62%2.49%9.57%15.72%21.88%-19.58%14.37%3.94%-11.93%
GPN
Global Payments Inc.
-11.90%-30.11%-10.97%29.02%-25.91%-36.91%18.51%77.25%2.92%44.49%

Correlation

The correlation between OMC and GPN is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2001

0.39

Fundamentals

EPS

OMC:

$0.51

GPN:

-$3.90

PS Ratio

OMC:

0.58

GPN:

1.39

Total Revenue (TTM)

OMC:

$19.82B

GPN:

$8.83B

Gross Profit (TTM)

OMC:

$3.45B

GPN:

$4.25B

EBITDA (TTM)

OMC:

$1.14B

GPN:

$2.27B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OMC vs. GPN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OMC
OMC Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
OMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
OMC Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
OMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
OMC Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

GPN
GPN Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
GPN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPN Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
GPN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPN Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OMC vs. GPN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Omnicom Group Inc. (OMC) and Global Payments Inc. (GPN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OMCGPNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

0.98

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.68

-0.41

+1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.53

-0.81

+2.34

OMC vs. GPN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OMC Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is higher than the GPN Sharpe Ratio of -0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OMC and GPN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OMC vs. GPN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OMC drawdown since its inception was -61.22%, smaller than the maximum GPN drawdown of -70.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OMC and GPN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OMCGPNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.22%

-70.17%

+8.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.85%

-29.95%

+12.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.30%

-53.95%

+20.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.30%

-66.52%

+33.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.21%

-70.17%

+26.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.40%

-67.54%

+45.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.93%

-18.90%

+5.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.87%

14.92%

-7.05%

Volatility

OMC vs. GPN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Omnicom Group Inc. (OMC) is 9.23%, while Global Payments Inc. (GPN) has a volatility of 13.23%. This indicates that OMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GPN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OMCGPNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.23%

13.23%

-4.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.73%

30.58%

-3.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.65%

39.63%

-4.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.75%

36.64%

-7.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.73%

34.55%

-5.82%

Dividends

OMC vs. GPN - Dividend Comparison

OMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, more than GPN's 1.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GPN
Global Payments Inc.
1.85%1.29%0.89%0.79%1.01%0.66%0.36%0.12%0.04%0.04%0.06%0.06%
OMC
Omnicom Group Inc.
4.04%3.59%3.25%3.24%3.43%3.82%4.17%3.21%3.28%3.09%2.53%2.64%

Financials

OMC vs. GPN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Omnicom Group Inc. and Global Payments Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
6.24B
2.97B
(OMC) Total Revenue
(GPN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

OMC vs. GPN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Omnicom Group Inc. and Global Payments Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
16.6%
0
Portfolio components
OMC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Omnicom Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.04B and revenue of 6.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.6%.

GPN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Payments Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

OMC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Omnicom Group Inc. reported an operating income of 646.20M and revenue of 6.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.4%.

GPN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Payments Inc. reported an operating income of -15.65M and revenue of 2.97B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.5%.

OMC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Omnicom Group Inc. reported a net income of 418.70M and revenue of 6.24B, resulting in a net margin of 6.7%.

GPN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Payments Inc. reported a net income of -1.80B and revenue of 2.97B, resulting in a net margin of -60.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


OMC and GPN have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GPN has higher volatility (13.23%) compared to OMC (9.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OMC dropped -61.22% vs GPN's -70.17%.

OMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.35 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OMC and GPN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer