OMAH vs. UGA

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - OMAH is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by VistaShares, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. OMAH is actively managed, while UGA is passively managed. Over the past year, OMAH returned 11.47% vs 59.74% for UGA. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. OMAH charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UGA.

Performance

OMAH vs. UGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OMAH achieves a 5.30% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 64.09% return.

OMAH

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: -1.97%
• YTD: 5.30%
• 6M: 5.12%
• 1Y: 11.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UGA

• 1D: -1.12%
• 1M: -12.11%
• YTD: 64.09%
• 6M: 60.42%
• 1Y: 59.74%
• 3Y*: 18.95%
• 5Y*: 22.69%
• 10Y*: 14.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OMAH vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	5.30%	6.55%
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP	64.09%	0.62%

Correlation

The correlation between OMAH and UGA is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2025	0.01

Return for Risk

OMAH vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OMAH

OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 51
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 40
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 54

UGA

UGA Risk / Return Rank: 55
UGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
UGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
UGA Omega Ratio Rank: 49
UGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
UGA Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OMAH vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OMAH	UGA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	1.73	-0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.01	2.25	-0.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.30	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.84	3.17	+0.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.13	9.39	-0.26

OMAH vs. UGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OMAH Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the UGA Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OMAH and UGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

OMAH vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OMAH drawdown since its inception was -11.83%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OMAH and UGA.

Drawdown Indicators

	OMAH	UGA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.83%	-86.59%	+74.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.00%	-18.96%	+15.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.68%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.11%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.97%	-18.05%	+16.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.27%	-36.69%	+35.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.26%	6.43%	-5.17%

Volatility

OMAH vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) is 2.21%, while United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a volatility of 9.24%. This indicates that OMAH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OMAH	UGA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.21%	9.24%	-7.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.58%	30.57%	-24.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.04%	35.22%	-27.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.03%	34.45%	-21.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.03%	37.22%	-24.19%

OMAH vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

OMAH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

OMAH vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison

OMAH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.05%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	14.05%	12.86%
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OMAH and UGA in my portfolio?

OMAH and UGA have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OMAH or UGA?

UGA has higher volatility (9.24%) compared to OMAH (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OMAH dropped -11.83% vs UGA's -86.59%.

Which ETF is better, OMAH or UGA?

On 1-year performance, UGA leads with 59.74% vs 11.47% for OMAH. On fees, UGA is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, OMAH has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OMAH or UGA?

Over the 1-year period, UGA has performed better with a 59.74% return vs 11.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OMAH or UGA?

UGA is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OMAH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OMAH or UGA?

OMAH has the higher dividend yield at 14.05%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.

What is the main difference between OMAH and UGA?

OMAH is categorized as Derivative Income, while UGA is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: VistaShares and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for OMAH and 0.75% for UGA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.