PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OM3Y.DE vs. IS3N.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OM3Y.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EM IMI Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (OM3Y.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with OM3Y.DE having a 27.24% return and IS3N.DE slightly lower at 26.15%.


OM3Y.DE

1D
2.31%
1M
-0.96%
6M
24.29%
YTD
27.24%
1Y
43.57%
3Y*
19.94%
5Y*
8.21%
10Y*

IS3N.DE

1D
2.11%
1M
-1.18%
6M
22.85%
YTD
26.15%
1Y
42.71%
3Y*
19.59%
5Y*
8.39%
10Y*
9.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OM3Y.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
OM3Y.DE
iShares MSCI EM IMI Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
27.24%17.76%13.99%6.72%-14.83%6.11%8.07%21.61%-12.55%
IS3N.DE
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)
26.15%17.14%13.88%7.20%-13.85%7.09%7.07%20.99%1.17%

Correlation

The correlation between OM3Y.DE and IS3N.DE is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2018

0.98

The correlation between OM3Y.DE and IS3N.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OM3Y.DE vs. IS3N.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OM3Y.DE
OM3Y.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
OM3Y.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OM3Y.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
OM3Y.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
OM3Y.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
OM3Y.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

IS3N.DE
IS3N.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
IS3N.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OM3Y.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM IMI Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (OM3Y.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OM3Y.DEIS3N.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.40

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.89

4.04

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.16

13.47

-0.31

OM3Y.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OM3Y.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the IS3N.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OM3Y.DE and IS3N.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OM3Y.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OM3Y.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.70%, smaller than the maximum IS3N.DE drawdown of -35.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OM3Y.DE and IS3N.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OM3Y.DEIS3N.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.70%

-35.06%

+3.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.16%

-10.52%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.59%

-19.18%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.39%

-21.99%

-1.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.55%

-4.56%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.72%

-9.24%

+0.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.30%

3.16%

+0.14%

Volatility

OM3Y.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EM IMI Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (OM3Y.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) have volatilities of 9.28% and 8.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OM3Y.DEIS3N.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.28%

8.89%

+0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.14%

16.69%

+0.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.60%

19.07%

+0.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.02%

16.62%

+0.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.51%

18.15%

+1.36%

OM3Y.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both OM3Y.DE and IS3N.DE have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

OM3Y.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Dividend Comparison

OM3Y.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, while IS3N.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
IS3N.DE
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OM3Y.DE
iShares MSCI EM IMI Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.61%1.98%2.33%2.35%2.59%1.82%1.58%2.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, OM3Y.DE and IS3N.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

OM3Y.DE and IS3N.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.

OM3Y.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets IMI Screened Index, while IS3N.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (IMI).

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OM3Y.DE and IS3N.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer