PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OLVAS.HE vs. TGS.OL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

OLVAS.HE vs. TGS.OL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Olvi Oyj (OLVAS.HE) and TGS NOPEC Geophysical Company ASA (TGS.OL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

OLVAS.HE is traded in EUR, while TGS.OL is traded in NOK. To make them comparable, the TGS.OL values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OLVAS.HE achieves a 2.81% return, which is significantly lower than TGS.OL's 119.69% return. Over the past 10 years, OLVAS.HE has underperformed TGS.OL with an annualized return of 5.09%, while TGS.OL has yielded a comparatively higher 54.64% annualized return.


OLVAS.HE

1D
0.80%
1M
1.61%
YTD
2.81%
6M
6.20%
1Y
-5.13%
3Y*
8.87%
5Y*
-6.11%
10Y*
5.09%

TGS.OL

1D
-4.55%
1M
2.74%
YTD
119.69%
6M
128.97%
1Y
277.38%
3Y*
92.55%
5Y*
79.66%
10Y*
54.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OLVAS.HE vs. TGS.OL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OLVAS.HE
Olvi Oyj
2.81%11.74%8.20%-11.91%-33.05%7.92%20.70%34.27%8.57%9.60%
TGS.OL
TGS NOPEC Geophysical Company ASA
119.69%89.36%52.79%42.86%126.27%0.01%-27.92%87.23%31.12%17.43%

Correlation

The correlation between OLVAS.HE and TGS.OL is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2007

0.11

The correlation between OLVAS.HE and TGS.OL shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OLVAS.HE vs. TGS.OL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OLVAS.HE
OLVAS.HE Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
OLVAS.HE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OLVAS.HE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
OLVAS.HE Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
OLVAS.HE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
OLVAS.HE Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

TGS.OL
TGS.OL Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
TGS.OL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGS.OL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGS.OL Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
TGS.OL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGS.OL Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OLVAS.HE vs. TGS.OL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Olvi Oyj (OLVAS.HE) and TGS NOPEC Geophysical Company ASA (TGS.OL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OLVAS.HETGS.OLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-5.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.70

-0.74

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.32

14.05

-14.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.64

48.80

-49.45

OLVAS.HE vs. TGS.OL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OLVAS.HE Sharpe Ratio is -0.28, which is lower than the TGS.OL Sharpe Ratio of 5.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OLVAS.HE and TGS.OL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OLVAS.HETGS.OLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.28

5.12

-5.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.26

1.48

-1.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

1.06

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.71

-0.20

Drawdowns

OLVAS.HE vs. TGS.OL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OLVAS.HE drawdown since its inception was -57.68%, smaller than the maximum TGS.OL drawdown of -78.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OLVAS.HE and TGS.OL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OLVAS.HETGS.OLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.68%

-78.75%

+21.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.39%

-20.18%

+3.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.81%

-34.69%

+14.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.84%

-34.69%

-14.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.84%

-65.92%

+17.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.50%

-5.40%

-27.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.89%

-18.60%

+1.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.40%

5.78%

+2.62%

Volatility

OLVAS.HE vs. TGS.OL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Olvi Oyj (OLVAS.HE) is 3.42%, while TGS NOPEC Geophysical Company ASA (TGS.OL) has a volatility of 15.73%. This indicates that OLVAS.HE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TGS.OL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OLVAS.HETGS.OLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.42%

15.73%

-12.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.17%

32.57%

-19.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.16%

55.56%

-37.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.70%

54.14%

-30.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.40%

51.87%

-28.47%

Dividends

OLVAS.HE vs. TGS.OL - Dividend Comparison

OLVAS.HE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, less than TGS.OL's 39.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OLVAS.HE
Olvi Oyj
4.18%4.15%4.11%4.28%3.62%2.15%2.06%2.18%2.54%2.51%2.50%2.93%
TGS.OL
TGS NOPEC Geophysical Company ASA
39.96%73.70%57.40%47.46%40.42%47.82%49.57%31.50%25.28%20.86%21.78%44.78%

Financials

OLVAS.HE vs. TGS.OL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Olvi Oyj and TGS NOPEC Geophysical Company ASA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. OLVAS.HE values in EUR, TGS.OL values in NOK

Frequently Asked Questions


OLVAS.HE and TGS.OL have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OLVAS.HE and TGS.OL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer