TGS.OL vs. HH.CO
TGS.OL (TGS NOPEC Geophysical Company ASA) and HH.CO (H+H International A/S) are both stocks. TGS.OL operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy), while HH.CO operates in Building Materials (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, TGS.OL returned 56.99%/yr vs 5.20%/yr for HH.CO. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TGS.OL vs. HH.CO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
TGS.OL is traded in NOK, while HH.CO is traded in DKK. To make them comparable, the HH.CO values have been converted to NOK using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TGS.OL achieves a 101.20% return, which is significantly higher than HH.CO's -4.49% return. Over the past 10 years, TGS.OL has outperformed HH.CO with an annualized return of 56.99%, while HH.CO has yielded a comparatively lower 5.20% annualized return.
TGS.OL
- 1D
- -4.29%
- 1M
- 2.40%
- YTD
- 101.20%
- 6M
- 110.86%
- 1Y
- 251.57%
- 3Y*
- 86.97%
- 5Y*
- 82.09%
- 10Y*
- 56.99%
HH.CO
- 1D
- -2.52%
- 1M
- -9.26%
- YTD
- -4.49%
- 6M
- -3.17%
- 1Y
- -29.31%
- 3Y*
- -4.79%
- 5Y*
- -11.91%
- 10Y*
- 5.20%
TGS.OL vs. HH.CO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TGS.OL TGS NOPEC Geophysical Company ASA | 101.20% | 89.38% | 60.44% | 52.93% | 137.93% | -4.95% | -23.33% | 85.17% | 32.84% | 27.07% |
HH.CO H+H International A/S | -4.49% | 18.17% | -7.24% | -7.12% | -53.30% | 65.91% | 12.98% | 29.73% | -20.88% | 107.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between TGS.OL and HH.CO is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2007 | 0.12 |
The correlation between TGS.OL and HH.CO shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TGS.OL vs. HH.CO — Risk / Return Rank
TGS.OL
HH.CO
TGS.OL vs. HH.CO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TGS NOPEC Geophysical Company ASA (TGS.OL) and H+H International A/S (HH.CO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TGS.OL | HH.CO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +5.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +6.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.72 | 0.90 | +0.82 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 14.57 | -0.63 | +15.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 49.48 | -0.95 | +50.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TGS.OL | HH.CO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.78 | -0.67 | +5.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.59 | -0.29 | +1.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.16 | 0.14 | +1.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | -0.12 | +0.73 |
Drawdowns
TGS.OL vs. HH.CO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TGS.OL drawdown since its inception was -82.61%, smaller than the maximum HH.CO drawdown of -98.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGS.OL and HH.CO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TGS.OL | HH.CO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.61% | -98.15% | +15.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.64% | -47.35% | +29.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.42% | -47.35% | +9.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.42% | -72.10% | +34.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.27% | -72.10% | +13.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.90% | -86.35% | +81.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.42% | -86.55% | +65.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.17% | 30.94% | -25.77% |
Volatility
TGS.OL vs. HH.CO - Volatility Comparison
TGS NOPEC Geophysical Company ASA (TGS.OL) has a higher volatility of 14.67% compared to H+H International A/S (HH.CO) at 8.55%. This indicates that TGS.OL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HH.CO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TGS.OL | HH.CO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.67% | 8.55% | +6.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.91% | 33.31% | -2.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.97% | 44.10% | +9.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.87% | 41.46% | +10.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.23% | 38.25% | +10.98% |
Dividends
TGS.OL vs. HH.CO - Dividend Comparison
TGS.OL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.96%, while HH.CO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HH.CO H+H International A/S | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TGS.OL TGS NOPEC Geophysical Company ASA | 39.96% | 73.70% | 57.40% | 47.46% | 40.42% | 47.82% | 49.57% | 31.50% | 25.28% | 20.86% | 21.78% | 44.78% |
Financials
TGS.OL vs. HH.CO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TGS NOPEC Geophysical Company ASA and H+H International A/S. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
TGS.OL and HH.CO have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for TGS.OL and HH.CO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer