OLED vs. COST
OLED (Universal Display Corporation) and COST (Costco Wholesale Corporation) are both stocks. OLED operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology), while COST operates in Discount Stores (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, OLED returned 1.71%/yr vs 21.10%/yr for COST. Their 0.25 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
OLED vs. COST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OLED achieves a -30.62% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 10.87% return. Over the past 10 years, OLED has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 1.71%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 21.10% annualized return.
OLED
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 1.86%
- 6M
- -29.44%
- YTD
- -30.62%
- 1Y
- -43.72%
- 3Y*
- -16.66%
- 5Y*
- -18.44%
- 10Y*
- 1.71%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.91%
COST
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- 6M
- 1.55%
- YTD
- 10.87%
- 1Y
- 0.52%
- 3Y*
- 21.34%
- 5Y*
- 18.51%
- 10Y*
- 21.10%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.98%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.83B | $2.11B | $2.34B | |
| $67.47M | $61.91M | $71.90M |
OLED vs. COST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OLED Universal Display Corporation | -30.62% | -19.07% | -22.88% | 78.64% | -33.87% | -27.89% | 11.91% | 120.74% | -45.69% | 206.97% |
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 10.87% | -5.39% | 39.62% | 49.00% | -19.05% | 51.82% | 32.67% | 45.70% | 10.60% | 22.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between OLED and COST is -0.10, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 1996 | 0.25 |
The correlation between OLED and COST shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.28 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
OLED:
$3.75B
COST:
$422.14B
OLED:
$4.13
COST:
$26.51
OLED:
19.40
COST:
35.91
OLED:
2.66
COST:
2.81
OLED:
6.26
COST:
1.08
OLED:
$606.91M
COST:
$293.59B
OLED:
$447.83M
COST:
$11.12B
OLED:
$219.20M
COST:
$12.48B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OLED vs. COST — Risk / Return Rank
OLED
COST
OLED vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Universal Display Corporation (OLED) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OLED | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 1.03 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.91 | 0.12 | -1.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.53 | 0.26 | -1.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OLED vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OLED drawdown since its inception was -85.55%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OLED and COST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OLED | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.55% | -53.39% | -32.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.76% | -16.57% | -31.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -66.09% | -20.74% | -45.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.09% | -31.40% | -34.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.34% | -31.40% | -36.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -67.43% | -12.88% | -54.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.29% | -13.36% | -31.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.51% | 7.81% | +20.70% |
Volatility
OLED vs. COST - Volatility Comparison
Universal Display Corporation (OLED) has a higher volatility of 9.22% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 7.34%. This indicates that OLED's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OLED | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.22% | 7.34% | +1.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.76% | 15.13% | +16.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.83% | 19.96% | +19.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.02% | 22.93% | +21.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.46% | 22.03% | +25.43% |
Dividends
OLED vs. COST - Dividend Comparison
OLED's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, more than COST's 0.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 0.58% | 0.59% | 0.49% | 2.87% | 0.76% | 0.54% | 3.38% | 0.86% | 1.08% | 4.81% | 1.09% | 4.06% |
OLED Universal Display Corporation | 2.37% | 1.54% | 1.09% | 0.73% | 1.11% | 0.48% | 0.26% | 0.19% | 0.26% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
OLED vs. COST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Universal Display Corporation and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
OLED vs. COST - Profitability Comparison
OLED - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Universal Display Corporation reported a gross profit of 121.06M and revenue of 152.16M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.6%.
COST - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a gross profit of -17.68B and revenue of 70.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -25.1%.
OLED - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Universal Display Corporation reported an operating income of 53.65M and revenue of 152.16M, resulting in an operating margin of 35.3%.
COST - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported an operating income of 2.82B and revenue of 70.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.0%.
OLED - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Universal Display Corporation reported a net income of 49.42M and revenue of 152.16M, resulting in a net margin of 32.5%.
COST - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a net income of 2.19B and revenue of 70.53B, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
OLED and COST have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OLED has higher volatility (9.22%) compared to COST (7.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OLED dropped -85.55% vs COST's -53.39%.
COST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.10 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OLED and COST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer