PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OKTG vs. COTG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OKTG vs. COTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long OKTA Daily ETF (OKTG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OKTG achieves a 58.00% return, which is significantly higher than COTG's 17.32% return.


OKTG

1D
-16.25%
1M
133.83%
YTD
58.00%
6M
55.91%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

COTG

1D
1.39%
1M
-11.21%
YTD
17.32%
6M
1.51%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OKTG vs. COTG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between OKTG and COTG is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025

-0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OKTG vs. COTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long OKTA Daily ETF (OKTG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

OKTG vs. COTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OKTGCOTGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.33

-0.28

+1.61

Drawdowns

OKTG vs. COTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OKTG drawdown since its inception was -60.69%, which is greater than COTG's maximum drawdown of -25.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OKTG and COTG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OKTGCOTGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.69%

-25.69%

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.91%

-23.48%

+1.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.37%

-8.35%

-15.02%

Volatility

OKTG vs. COTG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OKTGCOTGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

137.60%

40.65%

+96.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

137.60%

40.65%

+96.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

137.60%

40.65%

+96.95%

OKTG vs. COTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both OKTG and COTG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

OKTG vs. COTG - Dividend Comparison

Neither OKTG nor COTG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


OKTG and COTG have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

OKTG and COTG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

OKTG and COTG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OKTG and COTG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer