PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OKTG vs. BILT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OKTG vs. BILT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long OKTA Daily ETF (OKTG) and iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OKTG achieves a 93.46% return, which is significantly higher than BILT's 14.30% return.


OKTG

1D
2.20%
1M
-2.49%
6M
107.76%
YTD
93.46%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

BILT

1D
0.11%
1M
-1.05%
6M
8.99%
YTD
14.30%
1Y
17.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.38M$1.70M$1.65M
$268.28K$488.97K$1.00M

OKTG vs. BILT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between OKTG and BILT is -0.22, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025

-0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OKTG vs. BILT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

OKTG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


BILT
BILT Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
BILT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BILT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
BILT Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
BILT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
BILT Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

OKTG vs. BILT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long OKTA Daily ETF (OKTG) and iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OKTGBILTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.60

OKTG vs. BILT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OKTG vs. BILT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OKTG drawdown since its inception was -60.69%, which is greater than BILT's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OKTG and BILT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OKTGBILTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.69%

-5.38%

-55.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.69%

-2.25%

-14.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.50%

-1.36%

-21.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

Volatility

OKTG vs. BILT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OKTGBILTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

130.11%

10.31%

+119.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

130.11%

10.31%

+119.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

130.11%

10.31%

+119.80%

OKTG vs. BILT - Expense Ratio Comparison

OKTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BILT's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

OKTG vs. BILT - Dividend Comparison

OKTG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BILT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.70%.


Frequently Asked Questions


OKTG and BILT have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BILT is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BILT is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for OKTG.

BILT has the higher dividend yield at 5.70%, compared with 0.00% for OKTG.

OKTG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BILT is Infrastructure Equities. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for OKTG and 0.60% for BILT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OKTG and BILT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer