OKLL vs. QTAP
OKLL (Defiance Daily Target 2x Long OKLO ETF) and QTAP (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, OKLL returned -88.33% vs 20.69% for QTAP. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. OKLL charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTAP.
Performance
OKLL vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OKLL achieves a -82.11% return, which is significantly lower than QTAP's 13.89% return.
OKLL
- 1D
- -17.58%
- 1M
- -50.58%
- 6M
- -88.47%
- YTD
- -82.11%
- 1Y
- -88.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTAP
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- 6M
- 13.32%
- YTD
- 13.89%
- 1Y
- 20.69%
- 3Y*
- 18.98%
- 5Y*
- 12.67%
- 10Y*
- —
OKLL vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
OKLL Defiance Daily Target 2x Long OKLO ETF | -82.11% | -25.10% |
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 13.89% | 8.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between OKLL and QTAP is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OKLL vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank
OKLL
QTAP
OKLL vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2x Long OKLO ETF (OKLL) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OKLL | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.81 | -0.82 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.90 | 8.34 | -9.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.17 | 42.65 | -43.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OKLL vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OKLL drawdown since its inception was -97.84%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OKLL and QTAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OKLL | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.84% | -29.44% | -68.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -97.84% | -2.49% | -95.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.84% | -0.78% | -97.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.47% | -4.94% | -59.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 75.16% | 0.49% | +74.67% |
Volatility
OKLL vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison
Defiance Daily Target 2x Long OKLO ETF (OKLL) has a higher volatility of 37.08% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) at 2.45%. This indicates that OKLL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OKLL | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 37.08% | 2.45% | +34.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 131.26% | 5.24% | +126.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 201.83% | 6.23% | +195.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 199.43% | 18.92% | +180.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 199.43% | 18.62% | +180.81% |
OKLL vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
OKLL has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
OKLL vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison
Neither OKLL nor QTAP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
OKLL and QTAP have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OKLL has higher volatility (37.08%) compared to QTAP (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OKLL dropped -97.84% vs QTAP's -29.44%.
On 1-year performance, QTAP leads with 20.69% vs -88.33% for OKLL. On fees, QTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTAP has been the lower-risk option at 2.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QTAP has performed better with a 20.69% return vs -88.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for OKLL.
OKLL and QTAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for OKLL and 0.79% for QTAP.
QTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OKLL and QTAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer