OKLL vs. ILS
OKLL (Defiance Daily Target 2x Long OKLO ETF) and ILS (Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OKLL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Defiance, while ILS is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by Brookmont. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, OKLL returned -73.38% vs 7.81% for ILS. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. OKLL charges 1.31%/yr vs 1.58%/yr for ILS.
Performance
OKLL vs. ILS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OKLL achieves a -64.46% return, which is significantly lower than ILS's 2.27% return.
OKLL
- 1D
- -4.03%
- 1M
- -30.54%
- YTD
- -64.46%
- 6M
- -73.01%
- 1Y
- -73.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ILS
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 1.26%
- YTD
- 2.27%
- 6M
- 2.63%
- 1Y
- 7.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OKLL vs. ILS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
OKLL Defiance Daily Target 2x Long OKLO ETF | -64.46% | -25.10% |
ILS Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF | 2.27% | 5.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between OKLL and ILS is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025 | 0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OKLL vs. ILS — Risk / Return Rank
OKLL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ILS
OKLL vs. ILS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2x Long OKLO ETF (OKLL) and Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OKLL | ILS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.69 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 14.18 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 52.13 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OKLL vs. ILS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OKLL drawdown since its inception was -96.29%, which is greater than ILS's maximum drawdown of -2.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OKLL and ILS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OKLL | ILS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.29% | -2.46% | -93.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -96.29% | -0.55% | -95.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.70% | 0.00% | -95.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -62.40% | -0.54% | -61.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.15% | — |
Volatility
OKLL vs. ILS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OKLL | ILS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.84% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.68% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 202.78% | 2.58% | +200.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 202.78% | 3.77% | +199.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 202.78% | 3.77% | +199.01% |
OKLL vs. ILS - Expense Ratio Comparison
OKLL has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is lower than ILS's 1.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
OKLL vs. ILS - Dividend Comparison
OKLL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ILS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.05%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ILS Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF | 8.05% | 6.06% |
OKLL Defiance Daily Target 2x Long OKLO ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OKLL and ILS have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, ILS leads with 7.81% vs -73.38% for OKLL. On fees, OKLL is cheaper at 1.31% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ILS has performed better with a 7.81% return vs -73.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OKLL is cheaper with a 1.31% expense ratio, compared with 1.58% for ILS.
ILS has the higher dividend yield at 8.05%, compared with 0.00% for OKLL.
OKLL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while ILS is Nontraditional Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Brookmont. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for OKLL and 1.58% for ILS.
Find the right allocation for OKLL and ILS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer