PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OKLL vs. COTG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OKLL vs. COTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2x Long OKLO ETF (OKLL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OKLL achieves a -51.28% return, which is significantly lower than COTG's 17.32% return.


OKLL

1D
-22.34%
1M
-20.06%
YTD
-51.28%
6M
-75.86%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

COTG

1D
1.39%
1M
-11.21%
YTD
17.32%
6M
1.51%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OKLL vs. COTG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between OKLL and COTG is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2025

-0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OKLL vs. COTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2x Long OKLO ETF (OKLL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

OKLL vs. COTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OKLLCOTGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.33

-0.28

-0.05

Drawdowns

OKLL vs. COTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OKLL drawdown since its inception was -96.29%, which is greater than COTG's maximum drawdown of -25.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OKLL and COTG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OKLLCOTGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.29%

-25.69%

-70.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-94.11%

-23.48%

-70.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-60.85%

-8.35%

-52.50%

Volatility

OKLL vs. COTG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OKLLCOTGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

205.33%

40.65%

+164.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

205.33%

40.65%

+164.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

205.33%

40.65%

+164.68%

OKLL vs. COTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

OKLL has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than COTG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

OKLL vs. COTG - Dividend Comparison

Neither OKLL nor COTG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


OKLL and COTG have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, COTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

COTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for OKLL.

OKLL and COTG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for OKLL and 0.75% for COTG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OKLL and COTG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer