PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OILK vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OILK vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with OILK having a 64.22% return and TQQQ slightly higher at 64.46%.


OILK

1D
1.40%
1M
-1.65%
YTD
64.22%
6M
60.70%
1Y
58.99%
3Y*
19.03%
5Y*
17.73%
10Y*

TQQQ

1D
-0.76%
1M
33.35%
YTD
64.46%
6M
55.93%
1Y
137.89%
3Y*
69.49%
5Y*
28.37%
10Y*
45.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OILK vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF
64.22%-11.86%8.18%-0.97%27.57%63.71%-61.09%30.48%-20.40%2.82%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
64.46%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-19.79%118.06%

Correlation

The correlation between OILK and TQQQ is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2016

0.12

The correlation between OILK and TQQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

OILK vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
OILK
TQQQ

Consumer Cyclical

100.0%
12.3%

Basic Materials

-

1.1%

Communication Services

-

15.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.7%

Energy

-

0.6%

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Industrials

-

2.8%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Technology

-

53.8%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

OILK
100.0%
TQQQ
12.3%

Basic Materials

OILK

-

TQQQ
1.1%

Communication Services

OILK

-

TQQQ
15.8%

Consumer Defensive

OILK

-

TQQQ
7.7%

Energy

OILK

-

TQQQ
0.6%

Financial Services

OILK

-

TQQQ
0.2%

Healthcare

OILK

-

TQQQ
4.2%

Industrials

OILK

-

TQQQ
2.8%

Real Estate

OILK

-

TQQQ
0.1%

Technology

OILK

-

TQQQ
53.8%

Utilities

OILK

-

TQQQ
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OILK vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OILK
OILK Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
OILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
OILK Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
OILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
OILK Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OILK vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OILKTQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.40

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

3.75

-0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.91

12.27

-5.36

OILK vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OILK Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OILK and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OILKTQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

2.92

-0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.43

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.74

-0.62

Drawdowns

OILK vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OILK drawdown since its inception was -83.76%, roughly equal to the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OILK and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OILKTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.76%

-81.66%

-2.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.35%

-36.97%

+19.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.42%

-58.04%

+34.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.69%

-81.66%

+46.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.66%

-0.76%

-2.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.61%

-18.52%

-14.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.56%

11.28%

-2.72%

Volatility

OILK vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) is 10.44%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 13.29%. This indicates that OILK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OILKTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.44%

13.29%

-2.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.26%

36.04%

-12.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.75%

47.60%

-18.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.12%

66.53%

-36.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.97%

65.96%

-29.99%

OILK vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

OILK has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

OILK vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

OILK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.18%, more than TQQQ's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF
8.18%4.79%3.11%5.80%17.32%68.82%0.13%0.94%0.58%6.17%0.00%0.00%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.36%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


OILK and TQQQ have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TQQQ has higher volatility (13.29%) compared to OILK (10.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OILK dropped -83.76% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

On 5-year performance, TQQQ leads with 28.37% vs 17.73% for OILK. On fees, OILK is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, OILK has been the lower-risk option at 10.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 28.37% return vs 17.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OILK is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TQQQ.

OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 0.36% for TQQQ.

OILK is categorized as Oil & Gas, while TQQQ is Leveraged Equities. OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index, while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 0.68% for OILK and 0.95% for TQQQ.

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OILK and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer