OILK vs. SKOR
OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) and SKOR (FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index, while SKOR is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the NorthernTrustUS Corporate Bond Quality Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, OILK returned 17.73%/yr vs 1.78%/yr for SKOR. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. OILK charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for SKOR.
Performance
OILK vs. SKOR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OILK achieves a 64.22% return, which is significantly higher than SKOR's 0.33% return.
OILK
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 64.22%
- 6M
- 60.70%
- 1Y
- 58.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- —
SKOR
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 0.53%
- 1Y
- 5.29%
- 3Y*
- 5.88%
- 5Y*
- 1.78%
- 10Y*
- 2.85%
OILK vs. SKOR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 64.22% | -11.86% | 8.18% | -0.97% | 27.57% | 63.71% | -61.09% | 30.48% | -20.40% | 2.82% |
SKOR FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund | 0.33% | 7.99% | 4.42% | 7.64% | -9.88% | -1.40% | 8.84% | 10.69% | -1.25% | 4.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between OILK and SKOR is -0.41, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2016 | -0.07 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between OILK and SKOR has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.07 to -0.41, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OILK vs. SKOR — Risk / Return Rank
OILK
SKOR
OILK vs. SKOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) and FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund (SKOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OILK | SKOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.06 | 1.95 | +0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.59 | 2.91 | -0.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.36 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.42 | 2.54 | +0.87 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.91 | 9.09 | -2.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OILK | SKOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.06 | 1.95 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.41 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.63 | -0.51 |
Drawdowns
OILK vs. SKOR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OILK drawdown since its inception was -83.76%, which is greater than SKOR's maximum drawdown of -15.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OILK and SKOR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OILK | SKOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.76% | -15.98% | -67.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.35% | -2.09% | -15.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.42% | -3.11% | -20.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.69% | -15.13% | -19.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -15.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.66% | -0.78% | -2.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.61% | -2.65% | -29.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.56% | 0.58% | +7.98% |
Volatility
OILK vs. SKOR - Volatility Comparison
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a higher volatility of 10.44% compared to FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund (SKOR) at 0.85%. This indicates that OILK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SKOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OILK | SKOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.44% | 0.85% | +9.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.26% | 1.99% | +21.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.75% | 2.72% | +26.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.12% | 4.42% | +25.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.97% | 4.90% | +31.07% |
OILK vs. SKOR - Expense Ratio Comparison
OILK has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than SKOR's 0.22% expense ratio.
Dividends
OILK vs. SKOR - Dividend Comparison
OILK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.18%, more than SKOR's 4.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 8.18% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SKOR FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund | 4.67% | 4.70% | 4.90% | 3.90% | 2.57% | 2.55% | 3.38% | 3.53% | 2.85% | 2.46% | 2.74% | 2.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OILK and SKOR have a correlation of -0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to SKOR (0.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OILK dropped -83.76% vs SKOR's -15.98%.
On 5-year performance, OILK leads with 17.73% vs 1.78% for SKOR. On fees, SKOR is cheaper at 0.22% per year. On volatility, SKOR has been the lower-risk option at 0.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, OILK has performed better with a 17.73% return vs 1.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SKOR is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.
OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 4.67% for SKOR.
OILK is categorized as Oil & Gas, while SKOR is Corporate Bonds. OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index, while SKOR tracks NorthernTrustUS Corporate Bond Quality Value Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for OILK and 0.22% for SKOR.
OILK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OILK and SKOR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer