PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OILK vs. DBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OILK vs. DBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil ETF (OILK) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OILK achieves a 47.49% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 71.26% return.


OILK

1D
-3.24%
1M
8.88%
6M
37.83%
YTD
47.49%
1Y
33.62%
3Y*
9.71%
5Y*
15.25%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.29%

DBE

1D
-4.26%
1M
15.98%
6M
57.84%
YTD
71.26%
1Y
61.44%
3Y*
15.22%
5Y*
17.82%
10Y*
12.24%
ALL TIME*
2.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.27M$1.08M$1.67M
$8.74M$7.86M$10.67M

OILK vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil ETF
47.49%-11.86%8.18%-0.97%27.57%63.71%-61.09%30.48%-20.40%2.82%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
71.26%-2.17%2.96%-12.14%33.77%57.56%-25.91%19.72%-12.95%5.21%

Correlation

The correlation between OILK and DBE is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2016

0.93

The correlation between OILK and DBE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OILK vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

OILK
OILK Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
OILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
OILK Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
OILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
OILK Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

DBE
DBE Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

OILK vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil ETF (OILK) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OILKDBEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.28

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.59

2.50

-0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.49

7.82

-3.32

OILK vs. DBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OILK Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the DBE Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OILK and DBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OILK vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OILK drawdown since its inception was -83.76%, roughly equal to the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OILK and DBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OILKDBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.76%

-86.69%

+2.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.19%

-24.72%

+3.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.42%

-24.72%

+1.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.69%

-38.74%

+4.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.47%

-34.98%

+21.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.27%

-57.13%

+24.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.52%

7.90%

-0.38%

Volatility

OILK vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil ETF (OILK) is 11.95%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 15.07%. This indicates that OILK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OILKDBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.95%

15.07%

-3.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.22%

34.26%

-8.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.24%

37.66%

-7.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.48%

30.15%

+0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.00%

28.60%

+7.40%

OILK vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

OILK has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

OILK vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison

OILK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.51%, more than DBE's 2.26% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
2.26%3.86%6.32%3.87%0.75%0.00%0.00%1.79%1.67%0.00%
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil ETF
11.51%4.79%3.11%5.80%17.32%68.82%0.13%0.94%0.58%6.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, OILK and DBE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DBE has higher volatility (15.07%) compared to OILK (11.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OILK dropped -83.76% vs DBE's -86.69%.

On 5-year performance, DBE leads with 17.82% vs 15.25% for OILK. On fees, OILK is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, OILK has been the lower-risk option at 11.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DBE has performed better with a 17.82% return vs 15.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OILK is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBE.

OILK has the higher dividend yield at 11.51%, compared with 2.26% for DBE.

OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index, while DBE tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for OILK and 0.78% for DBE.

DBE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OILK and DBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer