OILK vs. BPH
OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) and BPH (BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index, while BPH is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Precidian. OILK is passively managed, while BPH is actively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OILK charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for BPH.
Performance
OILK vs. BPH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
OILK
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- -13.38%
- YTD
- 40.78%
- 6M
- 38.63%
- 1Y
- 27.24%
- 3Y*
- 13.91%
- 5Y*
- 13.00%
- 10Y*
- —
BPH
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OILK vs. BPH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | -13.38% |
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF | -5.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between OILK and BPH is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026 | 0.60 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OILK vs. BPH — Risk / Return Rank
OILK
BPH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
OILK vs. BPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OILK | BPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.57 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.49 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OILK vs. BPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OILK drawdown since its inception was -83.76%, which is greater than BPH's maximum drawdown of -9.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OILK and BPH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OILK | BPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.76% | -9.43% | -74.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.41% | -8.71% | -8.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.48% | -3.18% | -29.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.86% | — | — |
Volatility
OILK vs. BPH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OILK | BPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.02% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.07% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.00% | 24.10% | +4.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.27% | 24.10% | +6.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.96% | 24.10% | +11.86% |
OILK vs. BPH - Expense Ratio Comparison
OILK has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than BPH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
OILK vs. BPH - Dividend Comparison
OILK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.54%, more than BPH's 0.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 9.54% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OILK and BPH have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.
OILK has the higher dividend yield at 9.54%, compared with 0.53% for BPH.
OILK is categorized as Oil & Gas, while BPH is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for OILK and 0.19% for BPH.
Find the right allocation for OILK and BPH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer