OILK vs. BITO
OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) and BITO (ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index, while BITO is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by ProShares. OILK is passively managed, while BITO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, OILK returned 13.91%/yr vs 18.00%/yr for BITO. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. OILK charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BITO.
Performance
OILK vs. BITO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OILK achieves a 40.78% return, which is significantly higher than BITO's -29.93% return.
OILK
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- -13.38%
- YTD
- 40.78%
- 6M
- 38.63%
- 1Y
- 27.24%
- 3Y*
- 13.91%
- 5Y*
- 13.00%
- 10Y*
- —
BITO
- 1D
- -3.31%
- 1M
- -18.05%
- YTD
- -29.93%
- 6M
- -30.03%
- 1Y
- -42.09%
- 3Y*
- 18.00%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OILK vs. BITO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 40.78% | -11.86% | 8.18% | -0.97% | 27.57% | -3.96% |
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF | -29.93% | -11.19% | 104.45% | 137.33% | -63.91% | -29.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between OILK and BITO is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2021 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OILK vs. BITO — Risk / Return Rank
OILK
BITO
OILK vs. BITO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OILK | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 0.85 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.57 | -0.80 | +2.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.49 | -1.35 | +4.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OILK vs. BITO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OILK drawdown since its inception was -83.76%, which is greater than BITO's maximum drawdown of -77.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OILK and BITO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OILK | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.76% | -77.86% | -5.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.41% | -53.10% | +35.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.42% | -53.10% | +29.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.41% | -51.67% | +34.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.48% | -36.86% | +4.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.86% | 31.28% | -23.42% |
Volatility
OILK vs. BITO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) is 8.02%, while ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) has a volatility of 12.79%. This indicates that OILK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OILK | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.02% | 12.79% | -4.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.07% | 34.39% | -10.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.00% | 44.08% | -15.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.27% | 55.02% | -24.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.96% | 55.02% | -19.06% |
OILK vs. BITO - Expense Ratio Comparison
OILK has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than BITO's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
OILK vs. BITO - Dividend Comparison
OILK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.54%, less than BITO's 71.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF | 71.07% | 78.29% | 61.59% | 15.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 9.54% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OILK and BITO have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BITO has higher volatility (12.79%) compared to OILK (8.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OILK dropped -83.76% vs BITO's -77.86%.
On 3-year performance, BITO leads with 18.00% vs 13.91% for OILK. On fees, OILK is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, OILK has been the lower-risk option at 8.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BITO has performed better with a 18.00% return vs 13.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OILK is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BITO.
BITO has the higher dividend yield at 71.07%, compared with 9.54% for OILK.
OILK is categorized as Oil & Gas, while BITO is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for OILK and 0.95% for BITO.
OILK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OILK and BITO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer