OILK vs. BITO
OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) and BITO (ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index, while BITO is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by ProShares. OILK is passively managed, while BITO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, OILK returned 19.03%/yr vs 25.27%/yr for BITO. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. OILK charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BITO.
Performance
OILK vs. BITO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OILK achieves a 64.22% return, which is significantly higher than BITO's -26.37% return.
OILK
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 64.22%
- 6M
- 60.70%
- 1Y
- 58.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- —
BITO
- 1D
- -2.94%
- 1M
- -18.61%
- YTD
- -26.37%
- 6M
- -30.81%
- 1Y
- -41.01%
- 3Y*
- 25.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OILK vs. BITO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 64.22% | -11.86% | 8.18% | -0.97% | 27.57% | -4.49% |
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF | -26.37% | -11.19% | 104.45% | 137.33% | -63.91% | -31.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between OILK and BITO is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2021 | 0.06 |
The correlation between OILK and BITO shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
OILK vs. BITO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OILK
BITO
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
OILK
BITO
-
Basic Materials
OILK
-
BITO
-
Communication Services
OILK
-
BITO
-
Consumer Defensive
OILK
-
BITO
-
Energy
OILK
-
BITO
-
Financial Services
OILK
-
BITO
Healthcare
OILK
-
BITO
-
Industrials
OILK
-
BITO
-
Real Estate
OILK
-
BITO
-
Technology
OILK
-
BITO
-
Utilities
OILK
-
BITO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OILK vs. BITO — Risk / Return Rank
OILK
BITO
OILK vs. BITO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OILK | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 0.85 | +0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.42 | -0.82 | +4.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.91 | -1.41 | +8.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OILK | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.06 | -0.95 | +3.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | -0.09 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
OILK vs. BITO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OILK drawdown since its inception was -83.76%, which is greater than BITO's maximum drawdown of -77.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OILK and BITO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OILK | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.76% | -77.86% | -5.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.35% | -50.05% | +32.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.42% | -50.05% | +26.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.66% | -49.22% | +45.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.61% | -36.73% | +4.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.56% | 29.09% | -20.53% |
Volatility
OILK vs. BITO - Volatility Comparison
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a higher volatility of 10.44% compared to ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) at 9.43%. This indicates that OILK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OILK | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.44% | 9.43% | +1.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.26% | 34.26% | -11.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.75% | 43.57% | -14.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.12% | 55.11% | -24.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.97% | 55.11% | -19.14% |
OILK vs. BITO - Expense Ratio Comparison
OILK has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than BITO's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
OILK vs. BITO - Dividend Comparison
OILK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.18%, less than BITO's 67.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF | 67.63% | 78.29% | 61.59% | 15.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 8.18% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OILK and BITO have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to BITO (9.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OILK dropped -83.76% vs BITO's -77.86%.
On 3-year performance, BITO leads with 25.27% vs 19.03% for OILK. On fees, OILK is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, BITO has been the lower-risk option at 9.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BITO has performed better with a 25.27% return vs 19.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OILK is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BITO.
BITO has the higher dividend yield at 67.63%, compared with 8.18% for OILK.
OILK is categorized as Oil & Gas, while BITO is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for OILK and 0.95% for BITO.
OILK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OILK and BITO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer