OILD vs. SEF
OILD (MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs) and SEF (ProShares Short Financials) are both Inverse Equities funds - OILD tracks the Solactive MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Index (-300%) while SEF tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, OILD returned -42.92%/yr vs -12.42%/yr for SEF. Their 0.35 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
OILD vs. SEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OILD achieves a -62.98% return, which is significantly lower than SEF's -3.89% return.
OILD
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- -27.98%
- 6M
- -43.08%
- YTD
- -62.98%
- 1Y
- -70.97%
- 3Y*
- -42.92%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -58.87%
SEF
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- -3.65%
- 6M
- -6.45%
- YTD
- -3.89%
- 1Y
- -7.65%
- 3Y*
- -12.42%
- 5Y*
- -7.52%
- 10Y*
- -12.30%
- ALL TIME*
- -13.94%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.68M | $2.54M | $3.73M | |
| $338.68K | $224.47K | $237.83K |
OILD vs. SEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OILD MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | -62.98% | -41.67% | -14.58% | -19.58% | -90.32% | 3.83% |
SEF ProShares Short Financials | -3.89% | -9.82% | -17.81% | -8.81% | 11.85% | -0.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between OILD and SEF is -0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2021 | 0.35 |
The correlation between OILD and SEF shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
OILD vs. SEF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OILD
SEF
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
OILD
SEF
-
Basic Materials
OILD
-
SEF
-
Communication Services
OILD
-
SEF
-
Consumer Cyclical
OILD
-
SEF
-
Consumer Defensive
OILD
-
SEF
-
Financial Services
OILD
-
SEF
Healthcare
OILD
-
SEF
-
Industrials
OILD
-
SEF
-
Real Estate
OILD
-
SEF
-
Technology
OILD
-
SEF
-
Utilities
OILD
-
SEF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OILD vs. SEF — Risk / Return Rank
OILD
SEF
OILD vs. SEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (OILD) and ProShares Short Financials (SEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OILD | SEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 0.92 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.95 | -0.47 | -0.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.42 | -1.17 | -0.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OILD vs. SEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OILD drawdown since its inception was -98.90%, roughly equal to the maximum SEF drawdown of -96.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OILD and SEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OILD | SEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.90% | -96.55% | -2.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -74.53% | -16.39% | -58.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -85.42% | -40.06% | -45.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -42.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.80% | -96.55% | -2.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -88.92% | -82.82% | -6.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 50.00% | 6.56% | +43.44% |
Volatility
OILD vs. SEF - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (OILD) has a higher volatility of 20.27% compared to ProShares Short Financials (SEF) at 3.82%. This indicates that OILD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OILD | SEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.27% | 3.82% | +16.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.12% | 11.03% | +39.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.36% | 14.55% | +48.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 79.04% | 17.92% | +61.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 79.04% | 20.46% | +58.58% |
OILD vs. SEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both OILD and SEF have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
OILD vs. SEF - Dividend Comparison
OILD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OILD MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SEF ProShares Short Financials | 3.49% | 4.33% | 5.72% | 4.43% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 1.25% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OILD and SEF have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OILD has higher volatility (20.27%) compared to SEF (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OILD dropped -98.90% vs SEF's -96.55%.
On 3-year performance, SEF leads with -12.42% vs -42.92% for OILD. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, SEF has been the lower-risk option at 3.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SEF has performed better with a -12.42% return vs -42.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OILD and SEF have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
SEF has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 0.00% for OILD.
OILD tracks Solactive MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Index (-300%), while SEF tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%). They also come from different issuers: REX and ProShares.
SEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.53 vs -1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OILD and SEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer