PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OILD vs. FLYD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

OILD vs. FLYD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (OILD) and MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

OILD vs. FLYD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
OILD
MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs
-59.82%-41.67%-14.58%-19.58%-60.98%
FLYD
MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs
26.36%-60.42%-54.13%-75.14%-46.23%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OILD achieves a -59.82% return, which is significantly lower than FLYD's 26.36% return.


OILD

1D
10.51%
1M
-15.65%
YTD
-59.82%
6M
-61.74%
1Y
-67.52%
3Y*
-46.53%
5Y*
10Y*

FLYD

1D
-3.97%
1M
7.80%
YTD
26.36%
6M
5.01%
1Y
-62.53%
3Y*
-52.14%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


OILD vs. FLYD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both OILD and FLYD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Return for Risk

OILD vs. FLYD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OILD
OILD Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
OILD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OILD Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
OILD Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
OILD Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
OILD Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

FLYD
FLYD Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
FLYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLYD Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
FLYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLYD Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OILD vs. FLYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (OILD) and MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OILDFLYDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.88

-0.67

-0.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.62

-0.73

-0.89

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.82

0.90

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.80

-0.76

-0.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.29

-0.86

-0.43

OILD vs. FLYD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OILD Sharpe Ratio is -0.88, which is lower than the FLYD Sharpe Ratio of -0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OILD and FLYD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OILDFLYDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.88

-0.67

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.77

-0.72

-0.04

Correlation

The correlation between OILD and FLYD is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

OILD vs. FLYD - Dividend Comparison

Neither OILD nor FLYD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

OILD vs. FLYD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OILD drawdown since its inception was -98.90%, roughly equal to the maximum FLYD drawdown of -97.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OILD and FLYD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


OILDFLYDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.90%

-97.96%

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-84.54%

-82.41%

-2.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.69%

-97.09%

-1.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-88.25%

-82.46%

-5.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

52.71%

72.53%

-19.82%

Volatility

OILD vs. FLYD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (OILD) is 19.05%, while MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD) has a volatility of 28.29%. This indicates that OILD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLYD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


OILDFLYDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.05%

28.29%

-9.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.16%

54.96%

-11.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

76.80%

92.87%

-16.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

79.54%

83.48%

-3.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

79.54%

83.48%

-3.94%