OILD vs. FLYD

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

OILD (MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs) and FLYD (MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs) are both Inverse Equities funds from REX - OILD tracks the Solactive MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Index (-300%) while FLYD tracks the MerQube MicroSectors U.S. Travel Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, OILD returned -44.47%/yr vs -52.16%/yr for FLYD. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

OILD vs. FLYD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (OILD) and MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OILD achieves a -57.86% return, which is significantly lower than FLYD's -26.43% return.

OILD

• 1D: 2.48%
• 1M: -7.04%
• 6M: -47.85%
• YTD: -57.86%
• 1Y: -65.56%
• 3Y*: -44.47%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLYD

• 1D: -3.83%
• 1M: 0.03%
• 6M: -25.09%
• YTD: -26.43%
• 1Y: -39.59%
• 3Y*: -52.16%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OILD vs. FLYD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
OILD MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs	-57.86%	-41.67%	-14.58%	-19.58%	-56.14%
FLYD MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs	-26.43%	-60.42%	-54.13%	-75.14%	-46.63%

Correlation

The correlation between OILD and FLYD is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.20
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2022	0.22

The correlation between OILD and FLYD shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

OILD vs. FLYD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	OILD	FLYD
Energy	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	7.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-	51.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	27.8%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Technology	-	13.2%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

OILD vs. FLYD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OILD

OILD Risk / Return Rank: 1
OILD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
OILD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
OILD Omega Ratio Rank: 1
OILD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
OILD Martin Ratio Rank: 2

FLYD

FLYD Risk / Return Rank: 4
FLYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
FLYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
FLYD Omega Ratio Rank: 6
FLYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
FLYD Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OILD vs. FLYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (OILD) and MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OILD	FLYD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.04	-0.53	-0.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.91	-0.38	-1.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.80	0.95	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.88	-0.71	-0.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.39	-1.41	+0.02

OILD vs. FLYD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OILD Sharpe Ratio is -1.04, which is lower than the FLYD Sharpe Ratio of -0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OILD and FLYD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

OILD vs. FLYD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OILD drawdown since its inception was -98.90%, roughly equal to the maximum FLYD drawdown of -98.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OILD and FLYD.

Drawdown Indicators

	OILD	FLYD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.90%	-98.49%	-0.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-74.53%	-56.11%	-18.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-86.29%	-94.73%	+8.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-98.63%	-98.30%	-0.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-88.80%	-83.46%	-5.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	47.08%	28.12%	+18.96%

Volatility

OILD vs. FLYD - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (OILD) and MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD) have volatilities of 22.10% and 22.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OILD	FLYD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.10%	22.21%	-0.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	50.10%	63.63%	-13.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	63.18%	75.48%	-12.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	79.25%	83.56%	-4.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	79.25%	83.56%	-4.31%

OILD vs. FLYD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both OILD and FLYD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

OILD vs. FLYD - Dividend Comparison

Neither OILD nor FLYD has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OILD and FLYD in my portfolio?

OILD and FLYD have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OILD or FLYD?

FLYD has higher volatility (22.21%) compared to OILD (22.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OILD dropped -98.90% vs FLYD's -98.49%.

Which ETF is better, OILD or FLYD?

On 3-year performance, OILD leads with -44.47% vs -52.16% for FLYD. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, OILD has been the lower-risk option at 22.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OILD or FLYD?

Over the 3-year period, OILD has performed better with a -44.47% return vs -52.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OILD or FLYD?

OILD and FLYD have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OILD or FLYD?

OILD and FLYD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between OILD and FLYD?

OILD tracks Solactive MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Index (-300%), while FLYD tracks MerQube MicroSectors U.S. Travel Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLYD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.53 vs -1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.