OILD vs. EIPX
OILD (MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs) and EIPX (FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OILD is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Index (-300%), while EIPX is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by First Trust. OILD is passively managed, while EIPX is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, OILD returned -45.26%/yr vs 20.84%/yr for EIPX. At a correlation of -0.85, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
OILD vs. EIPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OILD achieves a -51.67% return, which is significantly lower than EIPX's 19.71% return.
OILD
- 1D
- -4.08%
- 1M
- 28.36%
- YTD
- -51.67%
- 6M
- -53.32%
- 1Y
- -58.26%
- 3Y*
- -45.26%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EIPX
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- -4.15%
- YTD
- 19.71%
- 6M
- 20.38%
- 1Y
- 24.65%
- 3Y*
- 20.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OILD vs. EIPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OILD MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | -51.67% | -41.67% | -14.58% | -19.58% | -0.86% |
EIPX FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF | 19.71% | 11.44% | 19.11% | 10.74% | 1.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between OILD and EIPX is -0.81, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2022 | -0.85 |
The correlation between OILD and EIPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.85 to -0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
OILD vs. EIPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OILD
EIPX
Energy
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
OILD
EIPX
Basic Materials
OILD
-
EIPX
-
Communication Services
OILD
-
EIPX
-
Consumer Cyclical
OILD
-
EIPX
-
Consumer Defensive
OILD
-
EIPX
-
Financial Services
OILD
-
EIPX
-
Healthcare
OILD
-
EIPX
-
Industrials
OILD
-
EIPX
Real Estate
OILD
-
EIPX
-
Technology
OILD
-
EIPX
Utilities
OILD
-
EIPX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OILD vs. EIPX — Risk / Return Rank
OILD
EIPX
OILD vs. EIPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (OILD) and FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OILD | EIPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.37 | -0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | 4.79 | -5.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.32 | 14.89 | -16.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OILD vs. EIPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OILD drawdown since its inception was -98.90%, which is greater than EIPX's maximum drawdown of -15.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OILD and EIPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OILD | EIPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.90% | -15.43% | -83.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -74.53% | -5.17% | -69.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -88.53% | -15.43% | -73.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.43% | -4.38% | -94.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -88.66% | -2.28% | -86.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 44.27% | 1.67% | +42.60% |
Volatility
OILD vs. EIPX - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (OILD) has a higher volatility of 21.38% compared to FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX) at 3.41%. This indicates that OILD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EIPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OILD | EIPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.38% | 3.41% | +17.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.66% | 8.42% | +41.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.70% | 11.15% | +51.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 79.40% | 15.02% | +64.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 79.40% | 15.02% | +64.38% |
OILD vs. EIPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both OILD and EIPX have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
OILD vs. EIPX - Dividend Comparison
OILD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EIPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIPX FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF | 2.73% | 3.23% | 3.27% | 3.48% | 0.34% |
OILD MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OILD and EIPX have a correlation of -0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OILD has higher volatility (21.38%) compared to EIPX (3.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OILD dropped -98.90% vs EIPX's -15.43%.
On 3-year performance, EIPX leads with 20.84% vs -45.26% for OILD. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, EIPX has been the lower-risk option at 3.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, EIPX has performed better with a 20.84% return vs -45.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OILD and EIPX have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
EIPX has the higher dividend yield at 2.73%, compared with 0.00% for OILD.
OILD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while EIPX is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: REX and First Trust.
EIPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OILD and EIPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer