PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OIH vs. MGNR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

OIH vs. MGNR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF (OIH) and American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

OIH vs. MGNR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
OIH
VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF
39.12%6.81%-3.63%
MGNR
American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF
17.82%50.57%22.78%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OIH achieves a 39.12% return, which is significantly higher than MGNR's 17.82% return.


OIH

1D
-1.99%
1M
0.18%
YTD
39.12%
6M
52.22%
1Y
51.45%
3Y*
14.61%
5Y*
16.68%
10Y*
-1.01%

MGNR

1D
0.74%
1M
-4.73%
YTD
17.82%
6M
27.81%
1Y
75.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


OIH vs. MGNR - Expense Ratio Comparison

OIH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than MGNR's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

OIH vs. MGNR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OIH
OIH Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
OIH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OIH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
OIH Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
OIH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
OIH Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

MGNR
MGNR Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
MGNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGNR Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
MGNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGNR Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OIH vs. MGNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF (OIH) and American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OIHMGNRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.36

2.75

-1.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.85

3.21

-1.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.49

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

4.80

-2.74

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.70

21.49

-15.79

OIH vs. MGNR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OIH Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is lower than the MGNR Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OIH and MGNR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OIHMGNRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

2.75

-1.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.00

1.73

-1.73

Correlation

The correlation between OIH and MGNR is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

OIH vs. MGNR - Dividend Comparison

OIH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, more than MGNR's 0.99% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OIH
VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF
1.23%1.71%2.01%1.36%0.95%0.98%1.23%2.10%2.13%2.60%1.40%2.39%
MGNR
American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF
0.99%1.17%0.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

OIH vs. MGNR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OIH drawdown since its inception was -94.45%, which is greater than MGNR's maximum drawdown of -22.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OIH and MGNR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


OIHMGNRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.45%

-22.06%

-72.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.13%

-16.06%

-10.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-64.72%

-4.73%

-59.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.75%

-4.01%

-44.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.43%

3.58%

+5.85%

Volatility

OIH vs. MGNR - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF (OIH) and American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR) have volatilities of 8.53% and 8.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


OIHMGNRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.53%

8.76%

-0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.79%

19.87%

+1.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.09%

27.73%

+10.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.48%

25.39%

+12.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.49%

25.39%

+17.10%