PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OIH vs. IEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OIH vs. IEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Oil Services ETF (OIH) and iShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (IEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OIH achieves a 34.19% return, which is significantly lower than IEO's 40.31% return. Over the past 10 years, OIH has underperformed IEO with an annualized return of -2.24%, while IEO has yielded a comparatively higher 10.74% annualized return.


OIH

1D
-0.70%
1M
6.27%
6M
9.53%
YTD
34.19%
1Y
65.42%
3Y*
5.59%
5Y*
18.06%
10Y*
-2.24%
ALL TIME*
-0.07%

IEO

1D
-1.56%
1M
12.30%
6M
30.88%
YTD
40.31%
1Y
45.13%
3Y*
12.01%
5Y*
23.78%
10Y*
10.74%
ALL TIME*
6.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$8.31M$7.48M$8.62M
$100.78M$109.60M$140.77M

OIH vs. IEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OIH
VanEck Oil Services ETF
34.19%6.81%-10.53%3.20%66.17%21.22%-41.19%-3.54%-45.03%-19.66%
IEO
iShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF
40.31%2.15%-1.45%3.57%57.82%75.57%-32.77%9.63%-19.44%0.33%

Correlation

The correlation between OIH and IEO is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2006

0.86

Over the past year, the correlation between OIH and IEO has dropped to 0.64 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

OIH vs. IEO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
OIH
IEO

Energy

100.0%
99.1%

Utilities

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

-

0.9%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

1.0%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Energy

OIH
100.0%
IEO
99.1%

Utilities

OIH
1.9%
IEO

-

Basic Materials

OIH

-

IEO
0.9%

Communication Services

OIH

-

IEO

-

Consumer Cyclical

OIH

-

IEO

-

Consumer Defensive

OIH

-

IEO

-

Financial Services

OIH

-

IEO

-

Healthcare

OIH

-

IEO

-

Industrials

OIH

-

IEO
1.0%

Real Estate

OIH

-

IEO

-

Technology

OIH

-

IEO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OIH vs. IEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

OIH
OIH Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
OIH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OIH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
OIH Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
OIH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
OIH Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

IEO
IEO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
IEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEO Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
IEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEO Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

OIH vs. IEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Oil Services ETF (OIH) and iShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (IEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OIHIEODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.28

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

2.78

+0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.62

6.95

+2.67

OIH vs. IEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OIH Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the IEO Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OIH and IEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OIH vs. IEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OIH drawdown since its inception was -94.45%, which is greater than IEO's maximum drawdown of -79.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OIH and IEO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OIHIEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.45%

-79.17%

-15.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.78%

-16.32%

-4.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.80%

-31.46%

-12.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.80%

-31.46%

-12.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.62%

-75.00%

-14.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.97%

-3.36%

-62.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.94%

-26.13%

-22.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.82%

6.51%

+0.31%

Volatility

OIH vs. IEO - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Oil Services ETF (OIH) and iShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (IEO) have volatilities of 7.97% and 7.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OIHIEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.97%

7.79%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.96%

20.54%

+0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.39%

25.78%

+3.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.47%

30.26%

+6.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.31%

34.91%

+7.40%

OIH vs. IEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

OIH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IEO's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

OIH vs. IEO - Dividend Comparison

OIH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, less than IEO's 1.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IEO
iShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF
1.88%2.61%2.63%3.00%3.77%2.62%3.17%1.85%1.67%0.94%0.98%2.03%
OIH
VanEck Oil Services ETF
1.27%1.71%2.01%1.36%0.95%0.98%1.23%2.10%2.13%2.60%1.40%2.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


OIH and IEO have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OIH has higher volatility (7.97%) compared to IEO (7.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OIH dropped -94.45% vs IEO's -79.17%.

On 10-year performance, IEO leads with 10.74% vs -2.24% for OIH. On fees, OIH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IEO has been the lower-risk option at 7.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IEO has performed better with a 10.74% return vs -2.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OIH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for IEO.

IEO has the higher dividend yield at 1.88%, compared with 1.27% for OIH.

OIH tracks MVIS US Listed Oil Services 25 Index, while IEO tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Oil Exploration & Production Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for OIH and 0.38% for IEO.

OIH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OIH and IEO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer