OIH vs. GXPE
OIH (VanEck Oil Services ETF) and GXPE (Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - OIH tracks the MVIS US Listed Oil Services 25 Index while GXPE tracks the MSCI USA Energy PureCap Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OIH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GXPE.
Performance
OIH vs. GXPE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OIH achieves a 35.03% return, which is significantly higher than GXPE's 22.46% return.
OIH
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- -13.39%
- YTD
- 35.03%
- 6M
- 35.52%
- 1Y
- 68.64%
- 3Y*
- 14.83%
- 5Y*
- 12.26%
- 10Y*
- -2.32%
GXPE
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- -7.62%
- YTD
- 22.46%
- 6M
- 23.23%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OIH vs. GXPE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
OIH VanEck Oil Services ETF | 35.03% | 21.68% |
GXPE Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF | 22.46% | 4.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between OIH and GXPE is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OIH vs. GXPE — Risk / Return Rank
OIH
GXPE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
OIH vs. GXPE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Oil Services ETF (OIH) and Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF (GXPE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OIH | GXPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.51 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.04 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OIH vs. GXPE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OIH drawdown since its inception was -94.45%, which is greater than GXPE's maximum drawdown of -14.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OIH and GXPE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OIH | GXPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.45% | -14.89% | -79.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.76% | -13.07% | -52.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.87% | -3.62% | -45.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.29% | — | — |
Volatility
OIH vs. GXPE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OIH | GXPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.14% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.14% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.39% | 20.69% | +9.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.79% | 20.69% | +16.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.38% | 20.69% | +21.69% |
OIH vs. GXPE - Expense Ratio Comparison
OIH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPE's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
OIH vs. GXPE - Dividend Comparison
OIH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, more than GXPE's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXPE Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF | 0.98% | 1.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OIH VanEck Oil Services ETF | 1.27% | 1.71% | 2.01% | 1.36% | 0.95% | 0.98% | 1.23% | 2.10% | 2.13% | 2.60% | 1.40% | 2.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OIH and GXPE have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXPE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXPE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for OIH.
OIH has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 0.98% for GXPE.
OIH tracks MVIS US Listed Oil Services 25 Index, while GXPE tracks MSCI USA Energy PureCap Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for OIH and 0.15% for GXPE.
Find the right allocation for OIH and GXPE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer